2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-3015(10)64703-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pcv34 Developing Hospice Drug Formulary Using Multi-Attribute Utilitytheory (Maut) Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common methods use mathematical functions to assist decision-makers in constructing their preferences. These functions include multi-attribute value theory (MAVT) (Pictet and Bollinger, 2008;Simpson, 1996), multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) (Gass, 2005;Khandelwal et al , 2006) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Gass, 2005;Rohacova and Markova, 2009). MAVT and MAUT are diffi cult to use because the utility elicitation process is time-consuming and complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods use mathematical functions to assist decision-makers in constructing their preferences. These functions include multi-attribute value theory (MAVT) (Pictet and Bollinger, 2008;Simpson, 1996), multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) (Gass, 2005;Khandelwal et al , 2006) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Gass, 2005;Rohacova and Markova, 2009). MAVT and MAUT are diffi cult to use because the utility elicitation process is time-consuming and complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%