2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curved bridges A and C exhibit similar behaviour as their straight counterparts: as the value of seismic intensity gets higher, an increase in skewness leads to higher structural response values ( [22,23] represents a damage state in which a significant plastic behaviour is present in critical column cross sections, spalling of larger surfaces of the protective coat is present, widening and propagation of cracks is also visible, but the structure is still outside of the collapse zone and vertical elements are capable of sustaining vertical loads. According to [24] this level of CDR corresponds to the limit state of significant damage.…”
Section: Analysis Of Seismic Response Of Structuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Curved bridges A and C exhibit similar behaviour as their straight counterparts: as the value of seismic intensity gets higher, an increase in skewness leads to higher structural response values ( [22,23] represents a damage state in which a significant plastic behaviour is present in critical column cross sections, spalling of larger surfaces of the protective coat is present, widening and propagation of cracks is also visible, but the structure is still outside of the collapse zone and vertical elements are capable of sustaining vertical loads. According to [24] this level of CDR corresponds to the limit state of significant damage.…”
Section: Analysis Of Seismic Response Of Structuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The PSDM is further convolved with the column capacity model to develop the conditional probability estimate of P (CD|FC). The damage states defined by HAZUS (ie, slight, moderate, extensive, and collapse) are considered as a guideline to determine the corresponding limit values for column damage, where the limit state of column drift ratio to reach each state is selected from the study by Yi et al According to Yi et al, the median column drift ratio limits are 0.7%, 1.5%, 2.5%, and 5% for reaching slight, moderate, extensive, and complete damage states, respectively. In addition, the capacity limit states are assumed to possess lognormal distributions with a dispersion of 0.35.…”
Section: Conditional Probability Damage Models Of the Rocking Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial elastic tangent of steel is equal to E 0 = 205, 000 MPa, and the yield strength is F y = 235 MPa, the strain hardening ratio (ratio between post-yield tangent and initial tangent) is 0.01. 20 ground acceleration histories were used among the set of 60 ground motion histories selected by FEMA from the 1994 Northridge earthquake [25]. These accelerations are corresponding to the subset of 10 % exceeding probability for 50 years.…”
Section: Non-linear Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%