2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(00)00336-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak-sensing discriminator for multichannel detectors with cross-talk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All cables were terminated with a 50 ohm resistor. As for the discriminator, the one we had was a little bit different from [13]-we did not have peak sensing circuitry. Also, the preamplifier was Analog Devices AD8009 instead of AD9623 and the discriminator was AD96687 instead of MAX9687.…”
Section: Other Remarks and Example Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All cables were terminated with a 50 ohm resistor. As for the discriminator, the one we had was a little bit different from [13]-we did not have peak sensing circuitry. Also, the preamplifier was Analog Devices AD8009 instead of AD9623 and the discriminator was AD96687 instead of MAX9687.…”
Section: Other Remarks and Example Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we examined the consequences of introducing the air gap between the fibre end and the photomultiplier glass window. The time resolution was determined by creating a histogram of the pulse detection times at the output of the leading edge discriminator [13] and subsequent examination of the spread of the obtained time distribution. Since the simulations were performed in accordance with the building of a new scintillating fibre detector for the CERN-COMPASS experiment [14], we used particular values of parameters for the scintillating fibres, the photomultiplier and the discriminator, obtained from manufacturer-supplied datasheets [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the grazing effect; a particle hitting a plane not perpendicularly to the plane, crosses several scintillator columns. The cross talk at different levels adds to this phenomenon [GOR00]. However, in the simulation, only one specific column fires.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus to simulate these effects, we have added, with a probability of 20−28%, to every true Monte-Carlo hit in the plane a firing in the neighbouring columns, and larger cluster of hits with smaller probability. The photomultipliers cross-talk has also to be taken into account and, due to their geometrical disposition, we have added to every true hit a 2−3% extra hit at a column distance of ∆n = ±4 [GOR00]. This procedure introduces some diffuseness to the simulated hit position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Hamamatsu H8711-1 0 photomultipliers with modified power supply system (booster-base) [1], in order to improve their response under high rate conditions. The photomultiplier's outputs were coupled to leading edge discriminators· [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%