Peat water treatment using oxidation and physical filtration system and its performance in reducing iron (Fe), turbidity, and color

Arifianingsih, Nur Novilina; Zevi, Yuniati; Helmy, Qomarudin; Notodarmojo, Suprihanto; Fujita, Hachiro; Shimayama, Yoshinobu; Kirihara, Masao

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202014807011

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Peat is used as activated carbon or as a peat filter. With a peat filter or activated carbon, it is possible to purify water from heavy metals and organic compounds [163]. Peat moss can be used as a raw material to produce activated carbon.…”

Section: Filtration Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pros and Cons of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peatlands: Review of Possibilities

Balode,

Bumbiere,

Sosars

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peatlands can become valuable resources and greenhouse gas sinks through the use of different management practices. Peatlands provide carbon sequestration; however, they are also among the greatest greenhouse gas emissions sources. The estimated annual carbon dioxide equivalent emissions from peat worldwide are 220 million tons. Novel strategies, methods, and technologies must be developed to enhance the sustainable use of peatlands and achieve climate targets by 2050, as set forth by the European Commission. There is no consensus in the scientific literature on which strategies included in the policy documents are more fruitful for reducing emissions. There are uncertainties and knowledge gaps in the literature that summarise the cons and benefits of each strategy regarding the potential of GHG emission reduction. Currently, peat is undervalued as a resource in the bioeconomy and innovation—a way that could save costs in peatland management. This review paper aims to analyse existing and potential strategies to minimise greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands. Studies show significant debates in the literature on whether the rewetting of peatlands and afforestation of previously drained peatlands can be defined as restoration. A more effective management of peatland restoration should involve combining restoration methods. The rewetting of peatlands should be realised in combination with top-soil removal to minimise methane emissions. The rewetting of peatlands should be used only in combination with revegetation after rewetting. One of the promising solutions for methane emission reduction could be paludiculture using sphagnum species. Products from paludiculture biomass can reduce GHG emissions and store long-term emissions in products. Paludiculture can also be the solution for further income for landowners and innovative products using the biomass of harvested paludiculture plants.

show abstract

Section: Filtration Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pros and Cons of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peatlands: Review of Possibilities

Balode,

Bumbiere,

Sosars

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several researches such as coagulation, flocculation, adsorption, filtration, membrane (Apriani et al, 2016), two stages adsorption-ultrafiltration (Mahmud et al, 2020), oxidation-filtration (Arifianingsih et al, 2020) coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration (Elma et al, 2022) have been attempted for peat water treatment. Among them, the most commonly applied is adsorption.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Iron Adsorption in Peat Water by Sago Waste Activated Carbon

Harivram

Syauqiah²,

Elma³

et al. 2022

Konv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In South Kalimantan, peat water is the main water sources for local people. But peat water has high iron content. It cannot be consumed directly and need further treatment. Adsorption is the most common technology to treat peat water. The goal of this research is to study sago waste adsorbent for iron removal in peat water. Citric acid was employed as activating agent in the sago waste activated carbon adsorbent fabrication. Carbonization process was done at 300 ℃ with 70, 80, 90, 100, 110 and 120 minutes of time variation. After treatment using the adsorbent, iron content was tested via Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). While, Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) were carried out to investigate the functional groups of sago pith waste activated carbon (SPWAC) and sago pith waste unactivated carbon (SPWUC). The experiment results show iron could be removed until 82% with iron concentration of 0.05 mg/l at 80 minutes. SPWAC and SPWUC have functional groups such as alkenes (C-H and C=C), carbonyl (C=O and C-O) and hydroxyl (O-H). Fe concentrations are still meet water quality standard according to No. 492/Menkes/PER/IV/2010 which is 0.3 mg/L. Therefore, adsorption uses sago pith waste activated carbon is an effective and inexpensive water treatment.

show abstract

Peat water purification using nanohydroxyapatite synthesized from Carbon Negative Precipitated Calcium Carbonate precursor

Alif,

Fitria,

Arief

et al. 2024

Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peat water treatment using oxidation and physical filtration system and its performance in reducing iron (Fe), turbidity, and color

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Pros and Cons of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peatlands: Review of Possibilities

Pros and Cons of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peatlands: Review of Possibilities

Iron Adsorption in Peat Water by Sago Waste Activated Carbon

Peat water purification using nanohydroxyapatite synthesized from Carbon Negative Precipitated Calcium Carbonate precursor

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About