2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Early Warning Score and unplanned readmission to the pediatric intensive care unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, refuting evidence highlights that EWS validated tools have largely been modified to individual localities whereby the sensitivity and positive predictive values were too low to predict patient deterioration in hospital (Gao et al 2007, Jansen & Cuthberson 2010, Mandell et al 2015. As a result the utility, validity and reliability of EWS tools has been questioned (Gao et al 2007, Donohue & Endacott 2010, Shearer et al 2012, Mandell et al 2015.…”
Section: Ews Validity and Reliability (Mechanism)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, refuting evidence highlights that EWS validated tools have largely been modified to individual localities whereby the sensitivity and positive predictive values were too low to predict patient deterioration in hospital (Gao et al 2007, Jansen & Cuthberson 2010, Mandell et al 2015. As a result the utility, validity and reliability of EWS tools has been questioned (Gao et al 2007, Donohue & Endacott 2010, Shearer et al 2012, Mandell et al 2015.…”
Section: Ews Validity and Reliability (Mechanism)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total scores 0-4 are green, corresponding with the lowest risk patients. Scores 5-7 are yellow, [8][9][10][11] are orange, and 12 are red, with escalating scores indicating greater risk of decompensation. Any total score of 5 or a score of 3 in the neurocognitive or cardiac domain is considered a critical PEWS prompting further assessment from front line provider staff and therapy where clinically appropriate.…”
Section: Me Th O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both studies, higher PEWS were associated with an increased risk of readmission; however, implementing a pretransfer PEWS assessment did not significantly reduce readmissions to the cardiac PICU 19. For the general PICU, analysis of the retrospective data indicated that implementation would overwhelm the resources available due to delayed discharges and inappropriate readmission 18. Both studies indicate that PEWS alone is unlikely to be an effective tool to identify and prevent readmissions to PICU and assessment needs to include other factors such as chronic disease variables.…”
Section: Where Are They Used and How Do They Perform?mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Two studies have examined the ability of PEWS to prevent readmission to the general18 and the cardiac PICU 19. In both studies, higher PEWS were associated with an increased risk of readmission; however, implementing a pretransfer PEWS assessment did not significantly reduce readmissions to the cardiac PICU 19.…”
Section: Where Are They Used and How Do They Perform?mentioning
confidence: 99%