2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9418-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases

Abstract: Robotic surgery is safe and effective in children. An enormous variety of cases can be safely performed including complex cases in neonates and small children. Simple operations such as cholecystectomies have minimal advantages by using robotic technology but can serve as excellent teaching tools for residents and newcomers to this form of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The technology is ideal for complex hepatobiliary cases and thoracic surgery, particularly solid chest masses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
106
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[29] Few robotic myotomies in pediatric patients have been published in the literature (Table 3). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The total number of robotic Heller's myotomy cases, including ours, is 18 cases. Most patients underwent a concomitant anti-reflux procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29] Few robotic myotomies in pediatric patients have been published in the literature (Table 3). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The total number of robotic Heller's myotomy cases, including ours, is 18 cases. Most patients underwent a concomitant anti-reflux procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[2][3][4] Few case reports have been published on robotic-assisted Heller's myotomy in children. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The aim of this report is to describe our experience with robotic-assisted Heller's myotomy in children and to review the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using computer-assisted instruments for all minimally invasive urological procedures, we gain maximum experience with that technique, since port placements and the technique with the instruments differ from standard laparoscopy. This experience is beneficial also in other, more complex procedures, as been pointed out by others [18] such as, in the case of urology, partial nephrectomy and pyeloplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It offers improved 3-D vision and flexible instruments with a more natural and intuitive range of motion than conventional laparoscopic instruments, and has the potential to facilitate laparoscopic surgery with the same advantages. Some surgeons have managed to perform procedures with these new instruments that they have never done before with the standard laparoscopic instruments [18]. Our team has performed a Morgagni Hernia repair in a small child, and a radical cystoprostatectomy due to a rhabdomyosarcoma in the bladder in a young boy with computer-assisted surgery, thus converting an open procedure to a minimally invasive one with excellent results [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation