Scaphoid Fractures: Evidence-Based Management 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-48564-7.00021-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Scaphoid Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) [1,7,9–11]. There has not been any consensus on length of immobilization nor the type of immobilization within the literature [1–4,7–17]. Gholson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) [1,7,9–11]. There has not been any consensus on length of immobilization nor the type of immobilization within the literature [1–4,7–17]. Gholson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) [1,7,[9][10][11]. There has not been any consensus on length of immobilization nor the type of immobilization within the literature [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Gholson et al [1] reported longer time to union in proximal pole fractures, displaced fractures, chronic fractures, and fractures with evidence of avascular necrosis (AVN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%