2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedotransfer functions for estimating soil bulk density from existing soil survey reports in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
149
0
32

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
149
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…When found in natural conditions, Table 3. Bulk density (Db), gravimetric water content (W) and hydraulic conductivity obtained from PTFs developed by Benites et al (2007) and Tomasella et al (2003), based on Rosetta software, and on Embrapa's data. High correlations were also observed in aquifers belonging to P2 system.…”
Section: K-values Obtained By the Rosetta Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When found in natural conditions, Table 3. Bulk density (Db), gravimetric water content (W) and hydraulic conductivity obtained from PTFs developed by Benites et al (2007) and Tomasella et al (2003), based on Rosetta software, and on Embrapa's data. High correlations were also observed in aquifers belonging to P2 system.…”
Section: K-values Obtained By the Rosetta Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the hydraulic conductivity more appropriately and to adapt the PTFs for soils of the Federal District, values of soil density (Dd) and gravimetric water contents (W)were obtained. PTFs developed by Benites et al (2007), shown in equation (4) and Tomasella et al (2003), shown in equation (5) The PTF used to estimate the water retention parameters from van Genuchten's equations in the range between -33 kPa (W33) and -1500 kPa (W1500) is as follow (Tomasella et al 2003 (5) where CS = coarse sand (%); FS = fine sand (%); SI = silt (%); CL = clay (%); Db = bulk density (g.cm -3 ); Me = moisture equivalent (%); W 10kPa , W 33kPa , W 1500kPa gravimetric water content at 10, 33, and 1500 kPa, respectively (g.g -1 ); X 14 -X 17 and Z 9 -Z 11 and Z 13 , auxiliary variables.…”
Section: Pedotransfer Functions (Rosetta Software)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Texture was highly variable (41 AE 15% >0.02 mm sand fraction), ranging from sandy clay to heavy clay. Bulk density was only weakly positively correlated with sand content (r = 0.14); clay content is a better predictor of bulk density (see for example, Heuscher et al 2005;Benites et al 2007) but was not determined for these samples.…”
Section: Subsoil Variability At Paddock Scalementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Samples could be sampled from the following soil layers: 0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.4-0.5, 0.7-0.8 and 0.9-1.0 m for three out of nine pits and 0-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3 m in the other 6 pits ( Figure 2). Regression models or pedotransfer functions (Benites et al, 2007) can be used to estimate bulk density for the layers that were not sampled (i.e., 0.3-0.4, 0.5-0.6, 0.6-0.7, 0.8-0.9 m). In the three deeper soil pits (till 1.0 m) soil bulk density should be determined and soil C content should be analyzed from all the 36 samples per site.…”
Section: Sampling Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%