2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic and sacral morphology and their correlation with pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and lumbar alignment changes between standing and sitting postures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PT is the magnitude in which the pelvis rotates around the femoral heads while SS characterizes the S1 endplate position and these values comprise PI (PI = PT + SS) which is anatomically fixed, specific for each individual, and solidified after adolescence [ 5 , 7 ]. Realignment of the lumbar spine to PI has been shown to improve outcomes [ 8 , 9 ], and PT and SS are clinical predictors as well [ 5 , [10] , [11] , [12] ]. LL has typically been measured from L1-S1 while TK varies but is generally measured from T1-12 or T5-12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PT is the magnitude in which the pelvis rotates around the femoral heads while SS characterizes the S1 endplate position and these values comprise PI (PI = PT + SS) which is anatomically fixed, specific for each individual, and solidified after adolescence [ 5 , 7 ]. Realignment of the lumbar spine to PI has been shown to improve outcomes [ 8 , 9 ], and PT and SS are clinical predictors as well [ 5 , [10] , [11] , [12] ]. LL has typically been measured from L1-S1 while TK varies but is generally measured from T1-12 or T5-12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies primarily look at the difference in measurements from sitting to standing and correlate to disease severity or pre- and post-operation. Studies in healthy populations are now emerging that show significant changes in measures between sitting and standing radiograph markers that may even be influenced by age, gender, and other modifications in body position [ 3 , 12 , 17 , 20 , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] ]. Additionally, work is being performed in the artificial neural network space to predict sitting measures based on standing radiographs to inform surgical correction [ [41] , [42] , [43] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapidly evolving concepts in adult spinal deformity surgery have highlighted the importance of realigning the sagittal profile of the spine 8 , 9 . Considerations in spinal realignment include assessment of a deformity using the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and the pelvic incidence (PI) – lumbar lordosis (LL) discrepancy, as well as appreciating the extent of spinopelvic compensation using the pelvic tilt (PT) 9 , 10 . Retrolisthesis, which was once regarded as a possible form of spinal instability of unknown significance 11 , is now being increasingly recognized today as a compensatory process which occurs in patients with positive sagittal imbalance 9 , 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%