2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00083-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial

Abstract: Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

41
995
3
34

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,429 publications
(1,073 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
41
995
3
34
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum of toxicities with these agents was similar to that observed for ipilimumab, although the frequency and severity of adverse events was lower (approximately 10-15% for grade 3-4 adverse events) 80,85,86 . Subsequent clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of both anti-PD-1 agents in terms of ORR and PFS in the second-line setting after ipilimumab treatment 87,88 , and in terms of overall survival with frontline nivolumab 89 , compared with chemotherapy in each case.…”
Section: Immunotherapy With Immune-checkpoint Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum of toxicities with these agents was similar to that observed for ipilimumab, although the frequency and severity of adverse events was lower (approximately 10-15% for grade 3-4 adverse events) 80,85,86 . Subsequent clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of both anti-PD-1 agents in terms of ORR and PFS in the second-line setting after ipilimumab treatment 87,88 , and in terms of overall survival with frontline nivolumab 89 , compared with chemotherapy in each case.…”
Section: Immunotherapy With Immune-checkpoint Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as novel agents extend patient survival times, it becomes increasingly difficult to conduct long clinical trials in order to measure OS [75,76]. Although the use of ICBs has improved survival in melanoma over standard chemotherapy, with some patients experiencing OS of 3 to 5 years [77,78], when the follow-up is less than 1 year, median OS is usually not reached [22,23,39,43]. Therefore, there is an interest in validating surrogate endpoints that can accurately predict survival benefit in clinical trials of immunotherapy and using these surrogate endpoints for drug approval [75].…”
Section: Endpoints To Assess Clinical Outcomes Associated With Icbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, ICBs have been shown to significantly improve ORR when compared with standard therapies, for example in patients with melanoma [22,23,39], RCC [28], and NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression [43] (Table 2). ICBs have also been shown to prolong duration of response (DOR) when compared with standard therapies (Table 2) [22,23,25,39,42,43,46].…”
Section: Endpoints To Assess Clinical Outcomes Associated With Icbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The six-month progression-free rate, the primary endpoint of the study, was 34, 38, and 16%, respectively (pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg versus chemotherapy; HR 0.57; 95CI 0.45-0.73; p<0.0001; and pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg versus chemotherapy HR 0.50, 95CI 0.39-0.64; p<0.0001), with objective responses occurring in 21-26% of the cases. 36 Similarly, in the phase 3 CheckMate 037 study, 405 previously treated patients received either nivolumab or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Objective responses were reported in 31.7% in the nivolumab group vs. 10.6% in the chemotherapy group, and less toxic effects were seen with nivolumab (rate of grade 3-4 adverse events: 9% vs. 32%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%