People, infrastructure, and data: A pathway to an inclusive and diverse ecological network of networks

Abstract

Macrosystem‐scale research is supported by many ecological networks of people, infrastructure, and data. However, no network is sufficient to address all macrosystems ecology research questions, and there is much to be gained by conducting research and sharing resources across multiple networks. Unfortunately, conducting macrosystem research across networks is challenging due to the diversity of expertise and skills required, as well as issues related to data discoverability, veracity, and interoperability. The ecological and environmental science community could substantially benefit from networking existing networks to leverage past research investments and spur new collaborations. Here, we describe the need for a “network of networks” (NoN) approach to macrosystems ecological research and articulate both the challenges and potential benefits associated with such an effort. We describe the challenges brought by rapid increases in the volume, velocity, and variety of “big data” ecology and highlight how a NoN could build on the successes and creativity within component networks, while also recognizing and improving upon past failures. We argue that a NoN approach requires careful planning to ensure that it is accessible and inclusive, incorporates multimodal communications and ways to interact, supports the creation, testing, and promulgation of community standards, and ensures individuals and groups receive appropriate credit for their contributions. Additionally, a NoN must recognize important trade‐offs in network architecture, including how the degree of centralization of people, infrastructure, and data influence network scalability and creativity. If implemented carefully and thoughtfully, a NoN has the potential to substantially advance our understanding of ecological processes, characteristics, and trajectories across broad spatial and temporal scales in an efficient, inclusive, and equitable manner.

Fifteen Years of Integrated Terrestrial Environmental Observatories (TERENO) in Germany: Functions, Services, and Lessons Learned

“…Addressing global environmental problems by using integrated observations and data across networks internationally has created a new discipline of researchers (SanClements et al., 2022). Harmonizing the respective network‐to‐network data and research communities also provides added value and accelerates current understandings and predictability.…”

Impact of big data analytics in project success: Mediating role of intellectual capital and knowledge sharing

“…BDA can facilitate dismantling organizational silos and sharing information and expertise across departments and teams (Sleep et al, 2023). By providing a centralized platform for data analysis and sharing, big data analytics can contribute to developing a culture of collaboration and learning in which employees are encouraged to share their knowledge and expertise (SanClements et al, 2022).…”

Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in the Yellow River Source Region Based on MSPA and MCR Modelling

“…Based on landscape ecology, island biogeography, and population theory, ecological networks comprehensively analyze the distribution and connection of ecological patches in space [ 7 ]. Since the 1990s, ecological network research has involved all ecosystem aspects, including energy flow, material cycles, information transmission, and ecological network structure and composition [ 8 ].…”