People, Space and Place: a Multidimensional Analysis of Unemployment in Metropolitan Labour Markets

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly apparent that, in order to understand a range of socio-economic outcomes, research needs to be focused on a multi-dimensional approach that accounts for individual characteristics and behaviours together with locality and activity within space and place. Within labour market analysis there is a need to situate empirical analysis within a conceptual framework that considers both the assets of individuals within the labour force and the social and local labour market contexts in which they find themselves. Using a broad notion of employability, this paper develops an analysis of unemployment in Australia's metropolitan labour markets. Specifically it uses a combination of individual survey data and aggregate labour market data to consider the associations between these multi-level factors. It finds that, while individual characteristics are important in understanding unemployment in metropolitan areas, it is equally the case that the strength of spatially distinct labour markets also plays a role. The paper reaches the conclusion that, while contemporary labour market policy tends to focus on individual characteristics, there is a need to widen the policy understanding of labour market outcomes so that other broader contexts, including the impact of space and place, are also seen as being influential. KEY WORDS regional labour markets; unemployment; employability; space and place; disadvantage IntroductionQuestions regarding the uneven nature of labour market outcomes are a key topic within the social science literature. Research has focused on, among other things, understanding the uneven nature of jobs growth and questions of distributional outcomes (Partridge and Rickman,

Weaknesses of wickedness: a critical perspective on wickedness theory

“…Van Bueren, Klijn, & Koppenjan, 2003;Klijn & Koppenjan, 2004;Ansell & Gash, 2008). In addition, scholars are enabled to tie scholarly debates to contemporary societal issues, such as unemployment (Baum & Mitchell, 2010), health care (e.g. Ferlie, Fitzgerald, McGivern, Dopson, & Bennet, 2011), mental health (Hannigan & Coffey, 2011), education (Bore & Wright, 2009), environment, energy and health (Turnpenny, Lorenzoni, & Jones, 2009).…”

How National Planning Might Enrich Metropolitan Planning in Australia

“…Little account is taken of the social impacts of urban consolidation (Randolph, 2002;Randolph et al, 2010). While there is an acknowledgement of the different kinds of economic and social circumstances in different parts of the metropolitan areas, as in Western Sydney (SGS Economics & Planning, 2004), the metropolitan strategy addresses these in land use terms and dwelling and workforce targets parcelled up into arbitrary regions without recognition of the complex interplay of labour and housing markets which these circumstances reflect (Baum et al, 2006;Baum, 2007). Studies of Western Sydney have shown the finegrained nature of these conditions of social disadvantage and lack of employment opportunities (Fagan & Dowling, 2005).…”

How to evaluate the governance of transboundary problems? Assessing a national counterterrorism strategy

“…Second, it enables scholars to tie these insights to contemporary, urgent societal matters, such as unemployment (Baum and Mitchell 2010), health care (e.g. Ferlie et al, 2011), mental health (Hannigan and Coffey, 2011), education (Bore and Wright, 2009), environment, energy and health (Turnpenny et al, 2009).…”