GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489)
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2003.1258196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PER-prediction for PHY mode selection in OFDM communication systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the complexity of the PER prediction, a common approach is to map these parameters onto a single link quality metric (LQM) [3][4][5][6][7] which could be associated to the PER by means of a look-up table. For each MCS, it is possible to define a range of LQM values over which the MCS maximizes throughput.…”
Section: St P R(p Ermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the complexity of the PER prediction, a common approach is to map these parameters onto a single link quality metric (LQM) [3][4][5][6][7] which could be associated to the PER by means of a look-up table. For each MCS, it is possible to define a range of LQM values over which the MCS maximizes throughput.…”
Section: St P R(p Ermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust one-dimensional mappings have been widely studied in the literature, considering methods such as uncoded BER/RawBER [6], effective SNR [7], mutual-information (MI) [8], [9] and PER indicator [10]. We propose a novel link quality metric (LQM) for MIMO-OFDM to be used for FLA. We call it mean MI bit mapping (MMIBM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to frequency selectivity, the qualities of the sub-carriers within a SB may differ; the indicator x i,n should provide a good collective representation of the qualities for all the sub-carriers within the n-th SB Blankenship et al (2004); Ericsson (2003); Lampe & Rohling (2003). For convenience, we assume that the MCS rate R (c) j log 2 M j increases monotonically with j and that the rate of MCS 1 is zero.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%