2022
DOI: 10.2147/hiv.s372738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived HIV Stigma and Associated Factors Among Adult ART Patients in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Abstract: This study aimed to assess perceived HIV stigma and associated factors among adult ART patients in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 638 participants selected using a multistage sampling technique from July 10 to September 2020. A 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale was used to measure HIV-related stigma. Data were collected by the interview method using a pre-tested questionnaire. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 1330 publications identified in database searches, and another 2 papers were added through grey searches. Among them, 62 papers were removed due to duplicates; 1226 papers were excluded based on screening of titles or abstracts; 27 papers were excluded based on eligibility criteria by reading full texts; and 10 papers were excluded of them due to a lack of required information [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] and a duplicate paper [48]. Finally, a total of 7 studies were involved in this systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 1330 publications identified in database searches, and another 2 papers were added through grey searches. Among them, 62 papers were removed due to duplicates; 1226 papers were excluded based on screening of titles or abstracts; 27 papers were excluded based on eligibility criteria by reading full texts; and 10 papers were excluded of them due to a lack of required information [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] and a duplicate paper [48]. Finally, a total of 7 studies were involved in this systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%