2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of direct vs. averted gaze in portrait paintings: An fMRI and eye-tracking study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the experimental investigation of eye movements was introduced to art history (Rosenberg & Klein, 2015). Several studies have used eye trackers to analyze the perception of single artworks (Rosenberg, 2014;Wagner, 2013); to test general assumptions from art history (Brinkmann et al, 2014(Brinkmann et al, , 2019Kesner et al, 2018;Sancarlo et al, 2020); or to detect variety and diversity among groups of viewers (Brinkmann, 2017;Pihko et al, 2011;Rosenberg & Klein, 2015). However, to date, most eye tracking studies on art perception have been conducted in laboratories and with two-dimensional reproductions of artworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the experimental investigation of eye movements was introduced to art history (Rosenberg & Klein, 2015). Several studies have used eye trackers to analyze the perception of single artworks (Rosenberg, 2014;Wagner, 2013); to test general assumptions from art history (Brinkmann et al, 2014(Brinkmann et al, , 2019Kesner et al, 2018;Sancarlo et al, 2020); or to detect variety and diversity among groups of viewers (Brinkmann, 2017;Pihko et al, 2011;Rosenberg & Klein, 2015). However, to date, most eye tracking studies on art perception have been conducted in laboratories and with two-dimensional reproductions of artworks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The portraits were organized in duplets: each duplet contained two portraits by the same artist, the first portrait being classified as a “direct gaze” and the second one as an “averted gaze.” The subjects were instructed to observe the stimuli as if they were looking at paintings in gallery, no explicit evaluation task was involved. The study revealed that the portraits that established eye contact versus those with an averted gaze elicited increased activation in the lingual and inferior occipital gyri and the fusiform face area, in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and in several of the areas involved in social cognitive processes, especially the theory of mind: the angular gyrus/temporo-parietal junction and the inferior frontal gyrus ( Kesner et al, 2018 ). The same areas are typically activated in direct gaze contact in studies using more naturalistic stimuli ( Senju and Johnson, 2009 ) and – recently – also live eye-to-eye contact ( Cavallo et al, 2015 ; Kegel et al, 2020 ; Noah et al, 2020 ; Kelley et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Direct Versus Averted Gaze In Painted Portraitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanecemos cientes de que estamos sendo observados pelo sujeito, mas conforme a mudança ocorre, também ocorre a maneira como sentimos que estamos sendo vistos. Kesner et al (2018) argumentam que, ao olhar para retratos, estamos envolvidos "em inferências implícitas dos ... estados mentais e emoções do sujeito" (p. 97). A mulher em Seda e Caveira nos observa, mas não revela nada sobre seu estado mental.…”
Section: Tempo Retrospectivounclassified