2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percolation and Schramm–Loewner evolution in the 2D random-field Ising model

Abstract: The presence of random fields is well known to destroy ferromagnetic order in Ising systems in two dimensions. When the system is placed in a sufficiently strong external field, however, the size of clusters of like spins diverges. There is evidence that this percolation transition is in the universality class of standard site percolation. It has been claimed that, for small disorder, a similar percolation phenomenon also occurs in zero external field. Using exact algorithms, we study ground states of large sa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a fortunate coincidence that the problem of finding the ground state for an RFIM sample can be mapped to a maximumflow problem that is in P [32], i.e., there exist algorithms that solve it in a time that grows as a polynomial in the size of the system, including the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm of augmenting paths [33], the Goldberg-Tarjan push-relabel method [34], or variants thereof [35]. In the last few years, we have acquired significant knowledge about the ground-state properties of the RFIM [36][37][38][39][40][41]. The situation is different, however, for the case of the RFPM with q > 2 which corresponds to a multi-terminal flow or, equivalently, graph cut (GC) problem that is known to be NP hard [32,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a fortunate coincidence that the problem of finding the ground state for an RFIM sample can be mapped to a maximumflow problem that is in P [32], i.e., there exist algorithms that solve it in a time that grows as a polynomial in the size of the system, including the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm of augmenting paths [33], the Goldberg-Tarjan push-relabel method [34], or variants thereof [35]. In the last few years, we have acquired significant knowledge about the ground-state properties of the RFIM [36][37][38][39][40][41]. The situation is different, however, for the case of the RFPM with q > 2 which corresponds to a multi-terminal flow or, equivalently, graph cut (GC) problem that is known to be NP hard [32,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, for d ≥ 3, L b diverges at the thermodynamic transition point, below which the system is ferromagnetic [13]. For non-zero average fields H, on the other hand, even in 2D the size of spin clusters diverges at a critical value H c = H c (∆) [19][20][21][22]. However, the weight of these clusters is sub-extensive, such that the free energy remains analytic and no thermodynamic phase transition occurs.…”
Section: Random-field Ising Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since SLE implies several geometrical properties of the associated curves, it is not clear a priori whether a given distribution of fractal curves can in fact be described by SLE. Therefore there have been a number of computer simulation studies testing numerically the compatibility of the properties of different ensembles of curves with the predictions of SLE [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The present work is based on a note in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%