2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.dss.0000452638.60199.d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Buried Modification of the Purse-String Closure

Abstract: 3. Dayan SH, Arkins JP, Mathison CC. Management of impending necrosis associated with soft tissue filler injections. J Drugs Dermatol 2011;10: 1007-12. 4. Cohen JL. Understanding, avoiding, and managing dermal filler complications. Dermatol Surg 2008;34(Suppl 1):S92-9. 5. Latham E, Hare M, Neumeister M. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy. 2010. Available from

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many described modifications to the classic purse-string suture technique, including but not limited to undermining 9 versus no undermining, 3 use of an absorbable 3,7,10-13 versus nonabsorbable suture, 1,2,4,9,14 braided versus monofilament absorbable suture, 3,7,10,12,13 percutaneous 1,3,10,15 versus dermal 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,11 placement of sutures, partial circumferential purse-string suture, 6 use of one suture versus a stacked row of 2 purse string sutures, 11 using 2 separate purse-string sutures to close 1 wound, 12,14 and use of a lockdown 16 or anchor 13 technique in tying the securing knot. In our technique, we employ no undermining, a single row of an intradermally placed braided large caliber absorbable suture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many described modifications to the classic purse-string suture technique, including but not limited to undermining 9 versus no undermining, 3 use of an absorbable 3,7,10-13 versus nonabsorbable suture, 1,2,4,9,14 braided versus monofilament absorbable suture, 3,7,10,12,13 percutaneous 1,3,10,15 versus dermal 1,2,4,5,6,7,9,11 placement of sutures, partial circumferential purse-string suture, 6 use of one suture versus a stacked row of 2 purse string sutures, 11 using 2 separate purse-string sutures to close 1 wound, 12,14 and use of a lockdown 16 or anchor 13 technique in tying the securing knot. In our technique, we employ no undermining, a single row of an intradermally placed braided large caliber absorbable suture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous modifications to the PSC that have been reported. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The authors' most used modifications will be presented in more detail.…”
Section: Executionmentioning
confidence: 99%