“…In addition, the quality of these papers was found to be poor based on the SEQES scores. Only 5 of 59 articles achieved high-quality scores (6)(7)(8) [4,13,14,58,59] and the majority of all reviewed articles were of low quality (32/59, 54%) [5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 21, 22, 24, 28-33, 36, 38, 40, 44, 45, 47-50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 60, 61].…”