2001
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.127.2.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Percutaneous Tracheotomy: Is It Time to Reconsider Our Approach?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 Those who argue for standard surgical tracheostomies also claim low complication rates. 6,8,10,13,16,17 The risk involved in transportation to the operating room is eliminated if the open procedure is done at the bedside. 9,13,14,18 Others studies claim that bedside open tracheostomies are more cost effective than percutaneous methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,15 Those who argue for standard surgical tracheostomies also claim low complication rates. 6,8,10,13,16,17 The risk involved in transportation to the operating room is eliminated if the open procedure is done at the bedside. 9,13,14,18 Others studies claim that bedside open tracheostomies are more cost effective than percutaneous methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the procedure is done at the bedside, obviating the need for the transport of critically ill patients to the operating room 14,15 . Those who argue for standard surgical tracheostomies also claim low complication rates 6,8,10,13,16,17 . The risk involved in transportation to the operating room is eliminated if the open procedure is done at the bedside 9,13,14,18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%