“…In all these cases, consensus was obtained without difficulties by authors 1 and 5. A total of 60 papers were excluded after review; 27 as they dealt with specific LBP conditions ( Table 2) and 33 for other reasons: one review article [55], four case reports [7,27,129,148], one double publication [90], one of two studies reporting data from the same study sample [80], ten for evaluating signal changes other than those related to the endplate [6,20,51,53,71,113,116,139,146,150], and eight articles because they did not report the exact numbers needed to calculate the prevalence rates of VESC [4,10,109,110,114,122,133,141]. Finally, eight articles were excluded because the study samples were selected on the basis of the presence of VESC [41, 50,56,63,68,134,137,149].…”