1982
DOI: 10.3133/pp1242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perennial-streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry and sediment in Missouri River basin

Abstract: Geometry, channel-sediment, and discharge data were collected and compiled from 252 streamflow-gaging stations in the Missouri River basin. The stations, with several exceptions, have at least 20 years of streamflow records and represent the complete ranges of hydrologic and geologic conditions found in the basin. The data were analyzed by computer to yield simple and multiple power-function equations relating various discharge characteristics to variables of channel geometry and bed and bank material. The equ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
165
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bank strength is an important factor in relationships between channel width and channel-forming discharge, as weaker banks typically yield wider channels per unit discharge (e.g., Osterkamp and Hedman, 1982). Moore et al (2003) noted that bank cohesion was required to support meander development and a prominent chute cutoff on the Eberswalde deposit, but that the source of the cohesion remains unknown (possibilities include cementation, ice, or perhaps a high clay content).…”
Section: Channel-forming Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bank strength is an important factor in relationships between channel width and channel-forming discharge, as weaker banks typically yield wider channels per unit discharge (e.g., Osterkamp and Hedman, 1982). Moore et al (2003) noted that bank cohesion was required to support meander development and a prominent chute cutoff on the Eberswalde deposit, but that the source of the cohesion remains unknown (possibilities include cementation, ice, or perhaps a high clay content).…”
Section: Channel-forming Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moore et al (2003) preferred a channel-forming discharge of 700 m 3 /s. Irwin et al (2005a) used an empirical relationship between channel width and discharge with a recurrence interval of two years (a proxy for channel-forming discharge), where the relationship is more appropriate for weak channel banks and, therefore, more conservative (Osterkamp and Hedman, 1982). Their estimate was 550 m 3 /s, corresponding to runoff production of 1 cm/day, based on measurements of width and contributing area from Moore et al (2003).…”
Section: Channel-forming Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0 m in the cross-sectional profiles) to the opposite bank above which width increased at a greater rate than depth (Osterkamp and Hedman, 1982). Hence, each bankfull cross-section was characterised by the minimum width-to-depth ratio (Pickup and Warner, 1976) and, as higher breaks-of-slope occur in the cross-sectional profiles, provided a replicable and conservative measure of wb.…”
Section: Measuring Meander Wavelength (Lm) Sinuosity (S) Bankfull Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that channel geometry-based estimates of 5-and 10-year return periods are often as reliable as those based upon 5-10 years of streamflow records. In the USA, the relationship between flood discharge and river channel dimensions was first developed following the suggestion of Langbein (1960) after research in Nevada; after a succession of studies, including Hedman et al (1972Hedman et al ( , 1974, Scott & Kunkler (1976), Riggs (1978), Osterkamp & Hedman (1979, 1982, Webber & Roberts (1981), Omang et al (1983), Wahl (1983Wahl ( , 1984 and Lawlor (2004), the method was accepted by the water resource division of the US Geological Survey as an operational technique. Considerable progress has been made in the USA in estimation of discharge from channel geometry for specific regions and is summarized by Wahl (1984).…”
Section: Flood Estimation From River Channel Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%