1981
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1063277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perforated Appendix and Antibiotics

Abstract: 60 consecutive children operated for perforated appendicitis were treated randomly with either penicillin and streptomycin or with clindamycin and gentamycin. Suppurative complications occurred somewhat more often and were definitely more severe in the former group. The number of hospital days spent in the treatment of these complications were three times as great in the former than in the latter group. Bacteroides fragilis could be isolated in most of the severe infections treated without clindamycin. Two out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Although intravenous antibiotic therapy is a cornerstone of therapy for perforated appendicitis, the optimal regimen of antibiotics for children remains controversial. Although many physicians would argue that "standard therapy" consists of an aminoglycoside, a ␤-lactam, and an antibiotic with anaerobe coverage (ie, ampicillin, gentamicin, or metronidazole), [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] increasing evidence suggests that single-agent antibiotic therapy provides equivalent results, compared with multiagent regimens. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In fact, a meta-analysis reviewed 64 randomized, controlled trials comparing ␤-lactam monotherapy with ␤-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy for patients with sepsis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Although intravenous antibiotic therapy is a cornerstone of therapy for perforated appendicitis, the optimal regimen of antibiotics for children remains controversial. Although many physicians would argue that "standard therapy" consists of an aminoglycoside, a ␤-lactam, and an antibiotic with anaerobe coverage (ie, ampicillin, gentamicin, or metronidazole), [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] increasing evidence suggests that single-agent antibiotic therapy provides equivalent results, compared with multiagent regimens. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In fact, a meta-analysis reviewed 64 randomized, controlled trials comparing ␤-lactam monotherapy with ␤-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy for patients with sepsis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%