2017 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/eit.2017.8053427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of a congested and uncongested communication network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, throughput became saturated when the queue size and interarrival rate were beyond the critical point for all cases. The performance of Case (b) and Case (c) were compared (Ahamed, Sun, Vakilzadian, & Möller, 2017), and Case (b) had better performance as compared to other scenarios in terms of packet drop rate and queue size. However, in Case (c), the average E2E delay was higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, throughput became saturated when the queue size and interarrival rate were beyond the critical point for all cases. The performance of Case (b) and Case (c) were compared (Ahamed, Sun, Vakilzadian, & Möller, 2017), and Case (b) had better performance as compared to other scenarios in terms of packet drop rate and queue size. However, in Case (c), the average E2E delay was higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IV is a comparison of the E2E delay and packet drop rate for Case (b) when a link was added and Case (c) when a link was removed. Adding an extra link reduced the packet drop rate and service rate(Ahamed, Sun, Vakilzadian, & Möller, 2017); however, it increased the average E2E delays, requiring less queue size. The performance and behavior of the sequential server queuing models in this study were consistent with…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%