2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of a small-scale electrostatic precipitator with biomass combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors believe that the discrepancy between the measured and calculated efficiencies of electrostatic precipitation encountered in the practice of the authors and other researchers [73] can be explained not only by measurement inaccuracies but also by coagulation enhancements in energised ESPs.…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The authors believe that the discrepancy between the measured and calculated efficiencies of electrostatic precipitation encountered in the practice of the authors and other researchers [73] can be explained not only by measurement inaccuracies but also by coagulation enhancements in energised ESPs.…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…There is not much experience available about the behavior of biomass ash in electrostatic precipitators (EP), which is critical as biomass ash has vastly different types of ash particles. The literature points out (reference) that biomass ash may contain particles of sub-1-micron size whose charging mechanism may not be adequate to precipitate them in the EP [36]. The efficiency of the EP in terms of the number of particles may decrease, while it may not be affected in terms of mass.…”
Section: Cautionsmentioning
confidence: 99%