2019
DOI: 10.1080/09720529.2019.1695900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance analysis of CLEFIA and PRESENT lightweight block ciphers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The memory usage and throughput factors are discussed for all the light-weight block ciphers in the Industrial WSN system. Jangra et al [24] explains the implementation of the PRESENT and CLEFIA light-weight block ciphers in python and analyzes the performance metrics. The metrics like throughput, resource utilization, and security strength are discussed for both the ciphers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The memory usage and throughput factors are discussed for all the light-weight block ciphers in the Industrial WSN system. Jangra et al [24] explains the implementation of the PRESENT and CLEFIA light-weight block ciphers in python and analyzes the performance metrics. The metrics like throughput, resource utilization, and security strength are discussed for both the ciphers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it was reported that AES may not act as an ultimate choice for the IoT environment, due to the fact that it requires extensive hardware resources [43]. The software evaluation of [44] compared Present and Celfia in terms of security strength, performance, and resource utilization, demonstrating that Present requires fewer memory footprints than Celfia, due to the fact that the latter utilizes two S-boxes; however, Present requires more encryption time and average CPU cycles than Celfia.…”
Section: Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%