2011
DOI: 10.5120/2496-3373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Performance Analysis of Content Management Systems Joomla, Drupal and WordPress"

Abstract: At Present there are lots of open source content management systems (CMS) available in the market. As open source CMS has its own advantages but out of so many only few like Joomla, Drupal, WordPress are popular in the market because of good functionality and support. It is the obvious question for everyone that, what are the basic reasons that only these CMS are mostly acceptable? Lots of surveys have been done to know which is the best and why? But still it is unanswered. By certain comparison on data we wan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…of 12.5% for one million websites using CMS technology, followed by Joomla 2.5% and Drupal at a percentage of 1.4% [8]. The key features owned by WordPress among others are (1) dashboard for content setting; (2) writing management (post); (3) media management (images, audio, video); (4) page creation; (5) comment management comments; (6) setting themes, views, menus, and headers; (7) plug in management; and (8) …”
Section: B Wordpressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of 12.5% for one million websites using CMS technology, followed by Joomla 2.5% and Drupal at a percentage of 1.4% [8]. The key features owned by WordPress among others are (1) dashboard for content setting; (2) writing management (post); (3) media management (images, audio, video); (4) page creation; (5) comment management comments; (6) setting themes, views, menus, and headers; (7) plug in management; and (8) …”
Section: B Wordpressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, both studies highlighted the integration of information and knowledge and high levels of efficiency and usability as the main advantages of WCMS. Patel et al compared, in [20,26], several WCMS, trying to identify the proper scenario for each WCMS. The authors in [21] introduced a comparative study of seven WCMS, including Drupal, Joomla!, and WordPress.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Drupal with 6.5% and 4.6%, respectively [18]. In terms of performance, the works done in [20,21] compared several WCMS and both studies emphasized that WordPress, Joomla!, and Drupal were the most efficient ones, because they achieved a better load time and good static content, showed the Security vulnerabilities are a weak point of any system at the design and implementation levels, and WCMS are not an exception [9]. Bugs and flaws are both software problems differing in terms of the level at which they are presented (implementation and design, respectively); in any case, they are dangerous, and should be analyzed [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations