2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.3001742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of OSTBC-NOMA System in the Presence of Practical Impairments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is quite obvious that the aforementioned studies do not consider channel estimation error (CEE), feedback delay (FBD), and imperfect SIC (ipSIC) which are crucial not to be ignored although they comprise of multiple antenna and relaying techniques. Nevertheless, there are some investigations on MIMO-NOMA with/without relaying techniques considering practical impairments (such as CEE, FBD, and ipSIC) [34][35][36][37][38][39] to demonstrate the effects on the system performance, but still remain limited. In particular, in Reference 34, the system considered in Reference 25 is generalized to all STBC schemes, and OP and ergodic capacity (EC) performances are investigated by taking into account CEE, FBD and imperfect SIC.…”
Section: Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is quite obvious that the aforementioned studies do not consider channel estimation error (CEE), feedback delay (FBD), and imperfect SIC (ipSIC) which are crucial not to be ignored although they comprise of multiple antenna and relaying techniques. Nevertheless, there are some investigations on MIMO-NOMA with/without relaying techniques considering practical impairments (such as CEE, FBD, and ipSIC) [34][35][36][37][38][39] to demonstrate the effects on the system performance, but still remain limited. In particular, in Reference 34, the system considered in Reference 25 is generalized to all STBC schemes, and OP and ergodic capacity (EC) performances are investigated by taking into account CEE, FBD and imperfect SIC.…”
Section: Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, power allocation coefficients are determined according to the order of channel gains between the selected second antenna of BS and mobile users as ĥSU1majF2ĥSU2majF2ĥSU3majF2 and a1>a2>a3 (l=13al=1) since channel gains obtained by majority selection technique provide the best SNR values over all combinations which are much more effective in determining the power allocation coefficients as compared to the others obtained by randomly selection approach. Then, with the help of decoding method for STBC schemes provided in Reference 47 and by taking into account ipSIC at mobile users, instantaneous SINR that Ul can decode the signal of Uk (kl) is expressed as 34 γSUkl=akPSρ22σ2normalΥlPSρ22σ2normalΥl(ϖk+trueϖ˜k…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of studies based on performance analysis in A-STBC/NOMA network in the literature is minimal [11][12][13]. Also, in [14], the authors analyzed the network's Outage Probability for practical challenges such as CEE (Channel Estimation Error) FBD (Feedback Delay) on the downlink NOMA network using the OSTBC technique with code lengths 2 and 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], conventional Alamouti-STBC scheme has been applied to downlink multiuser NOMA system, where users are equipped with single antenna, and exact OP expression is obtained for any user over Nakagami-𝑚 fading channels. In [13], the same system investigated in [12] has been generalized to cover all STBC schemes [14] by taking into account practical impairments such as CEE, feedback delay (FBD) and imperfect SIC. However, using multiple antennas at the transmitter and receiver ends increases hardware complexity and power consumption due to multiple radio-frequency (RF) chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%