Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Science and System 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3209914.3209931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Analysis of POX and Ryu with Different SDN Topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the controller shall be validated in the real-world Internet and Brite topologies. In our previous work [24], we compared the performance of the POX and RYU controllers in various topologies. These topologies included Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, and data center networks (DCNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the controller shall be validated in the real-world Internet and Brite topologies. In our previous work [24], we compared the performance of the POX and RYU controllers in various topologies. These topologies included Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, and data center networks (DCNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian Jehad Ali, Seungwoon Lee, Byeong-hee Roh [12] membandingkan performa dari dua controller jaringan SDN antara Ryu dan Pox Controller. Pengujian controller dilakukan berdasarkan skenario topologi yang berbeda: Single, Linear, Tree.…”
Section: A Studi Literaturunclassified
“…The lower latency requirement leads to our preference for Ryu SDN controller since Ryu exhibits the best latency results in comparison with ONOS, OpenDayLight and Floodlight [41]. In addition, Ryu has better TCP throughput as compared to POX [42]. Moreover, Ryu is python-based which is much easier to integrate with existing mainstream machine learning libraries (e.g., scikit-learn in this paper).…”
Section: Online Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%