2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2014.6883894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance and applicability of candidate routing protocols for smart grid's wireless mesh neighbor area networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering the randomness accurately, our results will show correct performance trend for different areas given their node and concentrator densities. Although uniform node distribution has been commonly assumed in [10] and [16], adopting PPP is a better option because node locations are hardly uniformly distributed in practice, and PPP captures the possibility of node congregation at some locations.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the randomness accurately, our results will show correct performance trend for different areas given their node and concentrator densities. Although uniform node distribution has been commonly assumed in [10] and [16], adopting PPP is a better option because node locations are hardly uniformly distributed in practice, and PPP captures the possibility of node congregation at some locations.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved that GPSR can support different NAN services in terms of latency and reliability. The authors of [4] compared the performances of GPSR to RPL in the case of NAN network. The simulation results proved that RPL outperforms GPSR in terms of transmission reliability and delay in the particular case of SMs to DAP communications where no need of P2P communications.…”
Section: A Geographic Routing For Large Scale P2p Nanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographic routing and RPL emerge as the most promising candidates for routing traffic within the SG NAN. [4] compared RPL and GPSR for the case of NAN cluster with a unique aggregation point and 1000 SMs with uniform random placement and a node density of 2000 nodes/km2. They concluded better performance of the RPL in terms of delivery rate and end to end delay for packets sent from the SMs to the DAP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved that GPSR can support different NAN services in terms of latency and reliability. The authors of [17] compared the performances of GPSR to RPL in the case of NAN network. The simulation results proved that RPL outperforms GPSR in terms of transmission reliability and delay.…”
Section: A Geographic Routing For Vpp Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%