2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance characterization of a PCM storage tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
33
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…14 and 15 that HTF mass flow rate has the biggest impact on the effectiveness of the system, then is the fin height, while HTF inlet temperature seems has minor impact. In general, the value of e is less than 1.0 which was also verified by literatures [41][42][43]. However, if the heat exchange process between HTF and PCM is strongly effective, it is possible to have HTF outlet temperature (T f, out ) lower than PCM average temperature (T p, avg ), which thus results in e value greater than 1.0.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Pcm Thermal Storage Systemsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…14 and 15 that HTF mass flow rate has the biggest impact on the effectiveness of the system, then is the fin height, while HTF inlet temperature seems has minor impact. In general, the value of e is less than 1.0 which was also verified by literatures [41][42][43]. However, if the heat exchange process between HTF and PCM is strongly effective, it is possible to have HTF outlet temperature (T f, out ) lower than PCM average temperature (T p, avg ), which thus results in e value greater than 1.0.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of the Pcm Thermal Storage Systemsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…López-Navarro et al did an experimental characterization of a PCM storage tank with paraffin [7]. Novo et al did a review on large seasonal sensible heat storage [8].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, repeated thermal cycling of pure PCMs does result in some drawbacks. For instance the experiment conducted on a pure PCM storage tank by López-Navarro et al [5] showed a much lower heat transfer efficiency after a number of thermal cycling and was attributed to low thermal conductivity of pure PCM and longer storage/discharge time of more than 4 hours. In another study, the melting point of the PCM (Rubitherm-21) shifted from 21 to 28℃ [6] after 120 repeated experimental days which affected its stability for long term usage.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%