Performance Comparison Between AODV and DSR In Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET)

Ramli, Nor Ika Shahirah; Hisham, Syifak Izhar; Ismail, Nor Syahidatul Nadiah; Ramalingam, Mritha

doi:10.1109/icsecs52883.2021.00046

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The common on-demand routing protocols in practice are Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) [47], [48]. Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) [49], [50], Dynamic MANET On-demand (DYMO) [51], [52], Location-Aided Routing (LAR) [53], and Temporally-ordered routing algorithm (TORA) [54].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

Khudayer¹,

Al-Zabin²,

Anbar³

et al. 2023

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a group of wireless mobile nodes that can connect with each other over a number of hops without the need for centralized management or pre-existing infrastructure. MANET has been used in several commercial areas such as intelligent shipping systems, ad hoc gaming, and clever agriculture, and non-commercial areas such as army applications, disaster rescue, and wildlife observing domains. One of the main challenges in MANET is routing mobility management which affects the performance of MANET seriously. The routing protocols have been functionally classified into proactive routing protocols, reactive routing protocols, and hybrid routing protocols. The objective of this paper is to create observations about the advantages and disadvantages of these protocols. Thus, the aim of this paper is to conduct a comparative analysis of the three groups of MANET routing protocols by comparing their features and methods in terms of routing overhead, scalability, delay, and other factors. It was shown that the proactive protocols guarantee the availability of the routes. However, it suffers from scalability and overhead. Whereas, reactive protocols initiate route discovery only when data needs to be sent. However, reactive protocols introduce an undesirable delay due to route establishment, which affects the network performance. Hybrid protocols, attempt to utilize the beneficial features of both reactive and proactive protocols, hybrid protocols are suitable for large networks and keep up-to-date information, but they increase operational complexity. It was concluded that MANET needs enhancement with regard to routing in order to meet the required performance.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

Khudayer¹,

Al-Zabin²,

Anbar³

et al. 2023

IJACSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Joint Federated Learning and Reinforcement Learning for Maritime Ad Hoc Networks: An Integration of Personalized Collaborative Route Planning

Han

Yang

Cao³

2022

Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design and Implementation of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Using Opnet Modeler

Jaafar¹,

İbrahim²

2022

JECNAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobile Ad-Hoc Network is a good illustration of a decentralized organization that does not need a foundation to function. The self-configurable and uncomplicated organizational component of this Mobile Ad-Hoc Network have made it feasible to run a wide variety of apps. As a consequence, these applications may now be used. If useful guiding standards are used, Mobile Ad-Hoc Network will develop into a robust system. During our investigation, we will attempt to determine which competent steering convention for directing hypertext transfer protocol traffic is utilized throughout the company. This will be the primary focus of our inquiry, so we must make this determination as accurately as possible. For this inquiry of the exhibition, execution measures such as latency and throughput were used. In this job reenactment research, your expectations should be based on the conventions that it chose since they had shown higher performance on every one of these fourth different viewpoints considerations. In addition to that, one way that an organization may improve the efficiency with which it operates is by picking conventions that are more suited for the business after taking into consideration the needs of the organization. AODV, DSR, and OLSR are the three routing protocols that were studied in this study to enhance the performance of ad-hoc networks via the use of OPNET Modeler version 14.5.

show abstract

Performance Comparison Between AODV and DSR In Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET)

Cited by 3 publications

References 11 publications

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

Joint Federated Learning and Reinforcement Learning for Maritime Ad Hoc Networks: An Integration of Personalized Collaborative Route Planning

Design and Implementation of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Using Opnet Modeler

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About