2011 11th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/mms.2011.6068519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of Differential Evolution, Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in impedance matching of aperture coupled microstrip antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DE inherits some of its features from other EAs. [13][14][15] it differs considerably in some aspects as distance and direction information is used for guiding the search process. It works with the iterative method to optimize the given parameters for improving the candidate result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DE inherits some of its features from other EAs. [13][14][15] it differs considerably in some aspects as distance and direction information is used for guiding the search process. It works with the iterative method to optimize the given parameters for improving the candidate result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19], dual-band circularly polarized spidron fractal microstrip patch antenna for X and Ku band applications had been designed with frequency band ranging from 11.44 to 12.48 GHz and 13.47 to 14.39 GHz, the overall size was 50 3 50 3 1.52 mm 3 , this was again considered to be very large and resulted in a complex design. Therefore, visualizing the overall antenna size issues, the main aim of this paper is to design an inset-fed dual-band microstrip antenna using DE with small and compact size which covers the specified frequency range for application in X band (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and Ku band (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) in Ref. [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both groups agree that the DE performance is the best. In [33,34], PSO and GA were compared and PSO was found computationally more effective with slightly better objective function value reached. In [35], it is shown how PSO performs better than GA so some authors decided to use hybrid GA-PSO method [36,37].…”
Section: Optimization and Control Of Electrical Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions of patch elements and slots have been optimized by creating simple shapes without using a grid of cells. In [69], feed position as well as the antenna dimensions has been determined by using DE to make the MPA operates over the given bandwidth. In [68], optimization of positions of feeding probe and shorting pin with the objective of reducing the size is presented.…”
Section: Differential Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%