Performance Comparison of Mobile IPv6 and Its Extensions

Zhang, Zailong; Fang, Jun; Wang, Wuxia; Zhang, Shunyi

doi:10.1109/wicom.2007.452

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is also important to note that FMIPv6 and HMIPv6 combined can reduce the overall handover latency by 18 times when compared to the standard MIPv6. Similar studies regarding MIPv6, HMIPv6, FMIPv6 and F-HMIPv6 performance, as seen in [11], [12], [13], also presented very similar results. Our proposed integration of FMIPv6 and HMIPv6 follows the implementation used by those works except in the proceeding of Handover Initiate (HI) and Handover Acknowledgment (HAck) messages which is maintained between the previous access router and the new access router as seen in the FMIPv6 protocol (see Figure 2).…”

Section: Related Worksupporting

confidence: 79%

A QoS/Mobility-Aware Model for Mobile Internet

Lopes¹,

Nicolau

Santos³

2011

JCOMSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a QoS micro-mobility solution capable of providing QoS support for global mobility. The solution comprises enhancements with regards to the mobility management of Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and in the resourcemanagement of the Differentiated Services (DiffServ) QoS model. The mobility management of MIPv6 was extended with fast and local handovers in order to improve its efficiency in high dynamic micro-mobility scenarios.The DiffServ resource management was extended with adaptive and dynamic QoS provisioning in order to improve resource utilization in mobile IP networks. Furthermore, to improve resource utilization, the mobility and QoS messages have been coupled so that resource managementable to proactively react to mobility events can be attained.The performance improvement of the proposed solution inaddition to the model parametrization have been evaluated using a simulation model. Simulation results indicate that the solution avoids network congestion as well as the starvation of DiffServ classes of a lesser priority. Moreover, the results also indicate that bandwidth utilization for priority classes increased. The QoS offered to MN’s applications, in each DiffServ class, remained unchanged with MN mobility.

show abstract

Section: Related Worksupporting

confidence: 79%

A QoS/Mobility-Aware Model for Mobile Internet

Lopes¹,

Nicolau

Santos³

2011

JCOMSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Detailed discussion on these can be found in [64], [65] and [66]. Despite of a few attempts, further research on designing improved L3 handover frameworks is needed.…”

Section: Potential Research Solutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Handover in Mobile WiMAX Networks: The State of Art and Research Issues

Ray

Pawlikowski

Sirisena

2010

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The next-generation Wireless Metropolitan Area Networks, using the Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) as the core technology based on the IEEE 802.16 family of standards, is evolving as a Fourth-Generation (4G) technology. With the recent introduction of mobility management frameworks in the IEEE 802.16e standard, WiMAX is now placed in competition to the existing and forthcoming generations of wireless technologies for providing ubiquitous computing solutions. However, the success of a good mobility framework largely depends on the capability of performing fast and seamless handovers irrespective of the deployed architectural scenario. Now that the IEEE has defined the Mobile WiMAX (IEEE 802.16e) MAC-layer handover management framework, the Network Working Group (NWG) of the WiMAX Forum is working on the development of the upper layers. However, the path to commercialization of a full-fledged WiMAX mobility framework is full of research challenges. This article focuses on potential handover-related research issues in the existing and future WiMAX mobility framework. A survey of these issues in the MAC, Network and Cross-Layer scenarios is presented along with discussion of the different solutions to those challenges. A comparative study of the proposed solutions, coupled with some insights to the relevant issues, is also included.

show abstract

A Performance Evaluation of IP Mobility Support Protocols

Chen²,

Jiang

2010

2010 Second International Conference on Multimedia and Information Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Performance Comparison of Mobile IPv6 and Its Extensions

Cited by 4 publications

References 14 publications

A QoS/Mobility-Aware Model for Mobile Internet

A QoS/Mobility-Aware Model for Mobile Internet

Handover in Mobile WiMAX Networks: The State of Art and Research Issues

A Performance Evaluation of IP Mobility Support Protocols

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About