2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/223/1/012058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of plastic shopping bags in modern and traditional retail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Planstic has more tear resistance and better elongation performance than paper bags. Planstic has a tensile strength of 15 MPa, while traditional retail plastic bags have 25 MPa, 22 biodegradable bags 20 MPa, and paper bags have 14 MPa, which is lower than Planstic, in Figure 2a. The elongation, which is the length after stretching divided by the original length, of Planstic is about 205%.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, Planstic has more tear resistance and better elongation performance than paper bags. Planstic has a tensile strength of 15 MPa, while traditional retail plastic bags have 25 MPa, 22 biodegradable bags 20 MPa, and paper bags have 14 MPa, which is lower than Planstic, in Figure 2a. The elongation, which is the length after stretching divided by the original length, of Planstic is about 205%.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The elongation, which is the length after stretching divided by the original length, of Planstic is about 205%. In comparison, the elongation performance of traditional retail plastic bags and biodegradable bags is 200–250% and about 170%, respectively . Paper bags cannot be stretched very long, with only 120% elongation.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The usable lifetime of plastic bags is very short. After a few days of use, they are disposed of because they get dirty or because they are not able to fulfill their original container purpose 13,14 . However, they can take several decades to be degraded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%