2015 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modelling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/camad.2015.7390479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation and comparison of different multicarrier modulation schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a fair comparison between MIMO-FBMC and MIMO-OFDM systems, the SNR loss, due to the cyclic prefix (overhead) in OFDM, must be considered. For this reason, we have calculated the noise power for both systems as discussed in [12]. The comparison shows the significance of the proposed algorithm especially for higher modulation schemes.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For a fair comparison between MIMO-FBMC and MIMO-OFDM systems, the SNR loss, due to the cyclic prefix (overhead) in OFDM, must be considered. For this reason, we have calculated the noise power for both systems as discussed in [12]. The comparison shows the significance of the proposed algorithm especially for higher modulation schemes.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, truncation may lead to interferences in the system that can significantly degrade the system performance. Without any compensation, the maximum allowable cut off symbols would be K − 2 so as to keep the signals detectable [12]. However, with compensation we can completely discard all the K − 1 symbols while still keeping the signals detectable.…”
Section: ) Real Branch Prototype Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations