2013
DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System under Conditions Similar to Daily Life

Abstract: Abbreviations: (BG)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6,[13][14][15][16] Some of the reported performance data of available CGM systems were obtained with similar procedures under similar conditions, thus allowing for an appropriate comparison to the results presented here. 6,16 The observed improvement in CGM performance over the usage period has already been reported for other CGM systems. 6,10,16,17 However, performance of the prototype sensor was noticeably constant over the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6,[13][14][15][16] Some of the reported performance data of available CGM systems were obtained with similar procedures under similar conditions, thus allowing for an appropriate comparison to the results presented here. 6,16 The observed improvement in CGM performance over the usage period has already been reported for other CGM systems. 6,10,16,17 However, performance of the prototype sensor was noticeably constant over the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,22 In this evaluation, the MARD and the PARD were remarkably better during induced glucose fluctuations compared with available CGM systems. 6,16 This suggests a decreased device-dependent time delay, as the physiological delay is assumed to be constant/comparable among CGM systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Seven Plus's successor, the DexCom G4 Platinum (DexCom, San Diego, CA) is reported to be more accurate, 24 and the Navigator was replaced by the FreeStyle Navigator II (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA). However, it is unclear if its performance has changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Nevertheless, the accuracy of CGM is increasing and may be approaching a physiological limit for subcutaneous glucose monitoring. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] CGM data and information CGM generates data streams that are both voluminous and complex. From an analytical point of view, these data are time series-sequences of BG readings that are equally spaced in time (e.g., every 5 min).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%