Performance evaluation of collaboration in the design process: Using interoperability measurement

Neghab, Amir Pirayesh; Etienne, Alain; Kleiner, Mathias; Roucoules, Lionel

doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.03.011

Cited by 22 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, the rating scale is from 0 to 100%. For example, some approaches use equations for determining the interoperability based on the "real / expected" ratio [33], [34], the interoperation performance indicators [35], [36], and others. These measures are commonly applied to compatibility and performance assessments.…”

Section: Measurements Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Military [16], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54] Industry [18], [19], [20], [23], [33], [34], [36], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82]…”

Section: Domain Referencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors in [34] propose a Computer-Mediated methodology for assessing the Conceptual interoperability between systems that have to collaborate in business/design Processes. It deals with the Compatibility type of assessment.…”

Section: Approach A18: Performance Evaluation Of Collaboration In Thementioning

confidence: 99%

“…what is considered as semantically interoperable). The mathematic development and notation are described in [34].…”

Section: Approach A18: Performance Evaluation Of Collaboration In Thementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review

Leal

Guédria

Panetto

2019

Computers in Industry

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of Interoperability is a necessity for organisations to achieve business goals and capture new market opportunities. Indeed, interoperability allows enterprises to exchange information and use it to seize their shared goals. Therefore, it should be verified and continuously improved. This is the main objective of the Interoperability Assessment (INAS). Indeed, such an assessment aims at determining the strengths and weakness of an enterprise in terms of interoperability. Many surveys and reviews have been proposed in the literature to analyse the existing INAS approaches. However, the majority of these reviews are focusing on specific properties rather than a general view of an INAS. Therefore, this paper proposes a systematic literature review of INAS approaches. The objectives are to identify the relevant INAS approaches and to compare them based on a holistic view based on their similar and different properties (e.g. type of assessment, the used measurement mechanism, and the addressed interoperability barriers). A bibliometric analysis of the selected INAS approaches is also conducted with a discussion of their advantages and limitations.

show abstract

Section: Measurements Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Domain Referencementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Approach A18: Performance Evaluation Of Collaboration In Thementioning

confidence: 99%

“…what is considered as semantically interoperable). The mathematic development and notation are described in [34].…”

Section: Approach A18: Performance Evaluation Of Collaboration In Thementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review

Leal

Guédria

Panetto

2019

Computers in Industry

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The development of interactions between product-and service-related activities can be challenging when actors from various fields of expertise or with different types of resources must exchange information [64][65][66]. In addition, it is crucial to encompass other types of knowledge, rather than the technical knowledge, as through time, the enterprise learns from its services and gains knowledge (e.g., learning from the maintenance services of a machine) [62].…”

Section: Synthesis Of Pss Viewpointsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptual Framework for Product Service Systems

Pirayesh

Doumeingts

Seregni

et al. 2018

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:To remain competitive in the current market, an enterprise must differentiate itself based on higher value propositions. For this purpose, since improving the product or service performance can reach some limits, one potential solution is to move towards new combinations of products and services. This evolution, called servitization, leads to the generation of Product Service Systems (PSS). Servitization requires not only a clear understanding of enterprise core business, but also a clear vision of the prevailing trends and challenges of PSS development from both the business and technological points of view. In addition, the evolution path should be aligned with the enterprise strategy. This paper first highlights the notion of symbiotic PSS where product systems and service systems, and their stakeholders, interoperate seamlessly based on a win-win approach. Then, it proposes a PSS Conceptual Framework (PSS-CF), which can be applied in the early stages of servitization to increase the understating of PSS dimensions and to facilitate the prioritization of the servitization investments. The framework dimensions were discussed in several iterations, from both the academic and industrial points of view, in the frame of a European research project. Moreover, the applicability of the framework was studied in four different industrial use-cases.

show abstract

Towards a Framework for Federated Interoperability to Implement an Automated Model Transformation

Labreche

Montarnal

Truptil

et al. 2020

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to adapt to changes in industrial world (customers and markets) and to competition, to create economic or strategic partnerships with external players or simply to integrate a connector to exchange information between the various services and software of a company, it is essential to have the necessary software tools (by development or deployment) that guarantee effective communication between the various parties, which are often heterogeneous and not known in advance, and overcome certain difficulties such as the multiplicity of information sources and the quality of the data.In such a context, the exchange or migration of data is a critical step. In order to facilitate the exchange, our approach aims at implementing federated interoperability with automated model transformation, supported by an interoperability evaluation, in order to ensure data retention despite the unforeseen uses (for example, some fields divert or mislabel) and to ensure their consistency during the transformation.

show abstract

Performance evaluation of collaboration in the design process: Using interoperability measurement

Cited by 22 publications

References 51 publications

Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review

Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review

Conceptual Framework for Product Service Systems

Towards a Framework for Federated Interoperability to Implement an Automated Model Transformation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About