2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of packet aggregation scheme for VoIP service in wireless multi-hop network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where R-factor is the resulting voice quality, which ranges from 0 to 100; 𝑅 0 is the initial signal-to-noise ratio; đŒ 𝑠 is the simultaneous impairment factor; đŒ 𝑑 is the mouth-to-air delay; đŒ 𝑒 is the equipment impairment factor, which includes codecs, packet loss, and end-to-end delay; and A is the advantage factor, which can be acquired through specific applications to improve voice quality [24,25].…”
Section: Codecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where R-factor is the resulting voice quality, which ranges from 0 to 100; 𝑅 0 is the initial signal-to-noise ratio; đŒ 𝑠 is the simultaneous impairment factor; đŒ 𝑑 is the mouth-to-air delay; đŒ 𝑒 is the equipment impairment factor, which includes codecs, packet loss, and end-to-end delay; and A is the advantage factor, which can be acquired through specific applications to improve voice quality [24,25].…”
Section: Codecsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], the authors investigated the effect of packet aggregation variation on VoIP QoS using an R-factor that consisted of end-to-end delay, packet loss, Id, Ie, and energy consumption of mobile nodes within an ad hoc network. This investigation revealed that an optimum amount of VoIP packets should be aggregated with the packets; this process is applicable irrespective of wireless channel conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the route between the two hops limits the maximum size of mux-pkt. In particular, a high-quality route carries large mux-pkt, and a low-quality route carries small mux-pkt, thereby improving the bandwidth utilization of multiplexing methods [14], [29].…”
Section: Hop-to-hop Multiplexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach achieves lower bandwidth utilization than the previous approach does because packet multiplexing occurs at the source hop only. In addition, the mux-pkt size is limited by the weakest link; hence, the bandwidth utilization of multiplexing methods is degraded [14], [29].…”
Section: End-to-end Multiplexingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation