International Conference on Networking and Communication, 2004. INCC 204.
DOI: 10.1109/incc.2004.1366569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of transmission control protocol in mobile ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many surveys have analyzed and compared the behavior of TCP over MANET (Floyd and Fall, 1999;Blessing and Chakrabarti, 2009;Wu and Wu, 2006;Andrei and Sally, 2004;Holland and Vaidya, 1999a;Ahmed et al, 2004), some of which have been conducted to improve and enhance the performance of TCP in this dynamic environment. However, this is not sufficient in providing a complete understanding of TCP current state over MANET.…”
Section: Jcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many surveys have analyzed and compared the behavior of TCP over MANET (Floyd and Fall, 1999;Blessing and Chakrabarti, 2009;Wu and Wu, 2006;Andrei and Sally, 2004;Holland and Vaidya, 1999a;Ahmed et al, 2004), some of which have been conducted to improve and enhance the performance of TCP in this dynamic environment. However, this is not sufficient in providing a complete understanding of TCP current state over MANET.…”
Section: Jcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the link layer abandons its attempts at link-level retransmission, TCP takes the loss as a congestion indicator. This misinterpretation of packet loss due to wireless channel error as congestion has badly affected TCP performance (Boukerche, 2008;Ahmed et al, 2004;Lochert et al, 2007). Therefore, there is a need for a detection mechanism to correctly interpret the loss as corruption instead of congestion (Habbal and Hassan, 2011).…”
Section: High Bit Error Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9], [10] and SWAN. Reference [9] uses ECN to improve the TCP performance in wireless networks, whereas [10] expands ECN to differentiate on the packet loss reasons and provide more network state information. In SWAN, all real-time packets, alternatively a subset of these, are marked when a congestion threshold is reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%