2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2012.6364932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of wireless mesh networks using IEEE 802.11s and IEEE 802.11n

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Saves battery life due to his lower power consumption. The IEEE802.11n presents more important performances compared to 802.11s mesh network but its throughput decreases with the increased number of hops [20].…”
Section: B Communication Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Saves battery life due to his lower power consumption. The IEEE802.11n presents more important performances compared to 802.11s mesh network but its throughput decreases with the increased number of hops [20].…”
Section: B Communication Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the possible effects of interference and hidden terminal problems, Wireless Mesh Networks may lose up to 50% loss of throughput at each hop when a real world environment is considered [26]. This is still the case even with the new IEEE 802.11n MAC standard that has better data rates and transmission range [6]. To alleviate this issue, one proposed solution is to use multiple radios and communicate via different channels [27].…”
Section: Broadcasting Overhead In Wireless Mesh Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…traditional small-scale Wireless Mesh Networks and expected to carry a heavier traffic and two-way traffic (e.g., due to DR and control messages from the utility [5]). Since large-scale real-life deployment of Wireless Mesh Networks and performance issues with increased network diameter has not been well investigated [6], more research is needed to adapt IEEE 802.11s protocol for Smart Grid Neighborhood Area Networks applications given that the standard has just been released and its real-life deployments are limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the possible effects of interference and hidden terminal problems, WMNs may lose up to 50% loss of throughput at each hop when a real world environment is considered [47]. This is still the case even with the new IEEE 802.11n MAC standard that has better data rates and transmission range [12]. To alleviate this issue, one proposed solution is to use multiple radios and communicate via different channels [48].…”
Section: Arp Broadcasting Overhead In Wmnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also supports Quality of Service (QoS) traffic by incorporating IEEE 802.11e standard [11]. However, since IEEE 802.11s is recently approved as an amendment to IEEE 802.11 standard in 2012, the large-scale real-life deployments of IEEE 802.11s-based SG communications network are limited and performance issues with the increase of the network diameter have not been well investigated [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%