2021
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2021.3057432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of MRT/RAS MIMO-NOMA With Residual Hardware Impairments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the above-mentioned HIs that will threaten the accurate transmission of the signal, the existence of CEEs is also one of the reasons for the mismatch between the expected signal and the actual transmission signal. To make the research more practical, many researchers have considered the influence of transceiver HIs and CEEs on the system during modeling and analysis [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], such as cognitive amplification and forwarding multirelay networks [25], beyond fifth-generation Internet of Things collaborative NOMA relay system [26], and ambient backscatter NOMA systems [27]. The authors of [28] described the performance of multiple relay systems when there were both transceiver HIs and CEEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above-mentioned HIs that will threaten the accurate transmission of the signal, the existence of CEEs is also one of the reasons for the mismatch between the expected signal and the actual transmission signal. To make the research more practical, many researchers have considered the influence of transceiver HIs and CEEs on the system during modeling and analysis [25][26][27][28][29][30][31], such as cognitive amplification and forwarding multirelay networks [25], beyond fifth-generation Internet of Things collaborative NOMA relay system [26], and ambient backscatter NOMA systems [27]. The authors of [28] described the performance of multiple relay systems when there were both transceiver HIs and CEEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system performance of NOMA downlink (DL) models such as single‐input single‐output (SISO), multiple‐input single‐output (MISO), and MIMO is evaluated in terms of outage probability and system throughput in Tran and Voznak 26 . The theoretical analysis of outage probability over Nakagami‐ m fading channel is conducted inToka and Kucur 27 ; the author utilizes maximum ratio transmission (MRT)/receive antenna selection (RAS) selection criterion, CEE, and imperfect SIC. The performance of cooperative NOMA MRC is compared with standard cooperative NOMA in Belmekki et al, 28 and it shows that MRC assisted NOMA offers a significant improvement over the conventional cooperative NOMA and also cooperative OMA system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to exploit receive diversity, RAS scheme has been applied at receivers of all users and eavesdropper. In [37], outage performance of hybrid MRT/RAS scheme is investigated in single-hop multi-user NOMA system in the presence of RHIs together with CEEs and ipSIC. In [38], impact of RHIs on dual-hop multi-user NOMA network with AF relay has been investigated over Nakagami-𝑚 fading channels in terms of OP and ergodic rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%