2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2016.7564832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of strong interference cancellation in flexible UL/DL TDD systems using coordinated muting, scheduling and rate allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLI mitigation and coordination schemes have therefore been widely investigated over recent prior art. In [10][11][12], coordinated cross-cell beam-forming, UL power control and cell muting are proposed to limit the residual network CLI, especially towards the more CLI-sensitive cell-edge UEs. Joint UL transceiver design [13][14][15], based on inter-cell signaling of the UEs' spatial signatures, is also introduced in order to isolate the BS-BS CLI spatial subspace from that is of the desired UL transmission.…”
Section: A State Of the Art Dynamic Tdd Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CLI mitigation and coordination schemes have therefore been widely investigated over recent prior art. In [10][11][12], coordinated cross-cell beam-forming, UL power control and cell muting are proposed to limit the residual network CLI, especially towards the more CLI-sensitive cell-edge UEs. Joint UL transceiver design [13][14][15], based on inter-cell signaling of the UEs' spatial signatures, is also introduced in order to isolate the BS-BS CLI spatial subspace from that is of the desired UL transmission.…”
Section: A State Of the Art Dynamic Tdd Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Unlike the state-of-the-art relevant TDD solutions [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], the proposed solution considers the joint capacity and latency statistics to optimize the URLLC outage latency performance. It is fully compliant with the current 3GPP 5G-NR standard specifications for dynamic-TDD deployments.…”
Section: Paper Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-coordinated TDD (NC-TDD): no RFC coordination is assumed. Cells independently and dynamically in time pick the RFCs from the code-book which most meet their individual traffic demand, as in (6). Hence, maximum TDD RFC flexibility is achieved with no coordination overhead; however, associated with potentially a large slot misalignment and severe average CLI levels accordingly.…”
Section: Comparison To the State-of-the-art Tdd Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used clustering methods include threshold method [16][17][18] and heuristic algorithm [19]. Without losing generality, we use a threshold method that based on link coupling loss [17].…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 2: If the corresponding interference is small for l i , i.e., it meets the condition of formula (8), then the shifting strategy which coincides with the W-TDD method [19] is adopted, and if the corresponding interference for l is too big, the C-TDD method is adopted. In all other cases, shifting-based dynamic TDD is used.…”
Section: Shifting Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%