2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.86.195106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the modified Becke-Johnson potential for semiconductors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
107
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As per our results in Table I, ab-initio DFT BZW and BZW-EF calculations generally yield results that agree more with experiment than corresponding ones obtained with TB-mBJ potentials. Several authors [42][43][44][45] have examined the performance of TB-mBJ potentials. The good results for the band gaps seem to be accompanied by serious underestimations of the absolute value of the binding energy of valence d electrons in several systems, including ZnO, 45 GaN, GaP, ZnS, ZnSe, and CdS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per our results in Table I, ab-initio DFT BZW and BZW-EF calculations generally yield results that agree more with experiment than corresponding ones obtained with TB-mBJ potentials. Several authors [42][43][44][45] have examined the performance of TB-mBJ potentials. The good results for the band gaps seem to be accompanied by serious underestimations of the absolute value of the binding energy of valence d electrons in several systems, including ZnO, 45 GaN, GaP, ZnS, ZnSe, and CdS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a known fact that the standard DFT functional local density approximation (LDA)/GGA always underestimate band gap. [46][47][48][49][50] In order to compare, we have used GGA functional along with the TB-mBJ functional for calculating band gaps.…”
Section: B Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a detailed analysis of the mBJLDA potential was made based on the calculation of the electronic band structure of 41 semiconductors [20]. This paper is a continuation of that work.…”
Section: The Band Gap: Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A surprising result was, nevertheless, obtained when the experimental low temperature lattice parameter, a LT , was introduced instead. Unexpected deviations of the band gap value from experiment as big as 48 % were obtained [20]. This is a disturbing result since the lattice parameters obtained from any optimization procedure, are judged to be as good as the small deviation from the experimental lattice parameter value, and so one expects to get the best result (the minimum deviation of the predicted band gap value from the experiment) when the experimental lattice parameter is used.…”
Section: The Band Gap: Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%