2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(03)00064-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of wall-stud cold-formed shear panels under monotonic and cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was followed by a counterpart numerical modeling on the earthquake performance of the mentioned experimental specimens (Fülöp and Dubina, 2004b). The two mentioned investigations yielded proper comparisons between experiments and FE results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was followed by a counterpart numerical modeling on the earthquake performance of the mentioned experimental specimens (Fülöp and Dubina, 2004b). The two mentioned investigations yielded proper comparisons between experiments and FE results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full-scale shear corrugated sheets with and without wall panels were investigated by Fülöp and Dubina (2004a). This study was followed by a counterpart numerical modeling on the earthquake performance of the mentioned experimental specimens (Fülöp and Dubina, 2004b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telue and Mahendran (2002) conducted experiments on cold-formed steel frames to investigate the behavior of plaster cover plates in the wall of these frames and concluded that the load-carrying capacity of the studs of wall panels would significantly increase if brace and cover plates were used. Fülöp and Dubina (2004) tested three X-braced screw-connected wall specimens (3.6 m long 9 2.44 m high) under in-plane lateral loading. Of the three wall specimens, one was tested monotonically and two cyclically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests of this type have been widely carried out in many other investigations, some of which are focused on the subject of connection ductility or seismic design of joints. In this sense, the tests performed by De Matteis and Landolfo [1,4] and Füllöp and Dubina [5,6] for the investigation of the seismic behaviour of shear frames with cladding can be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of joints together with buckling of members are the two main causes of frame collapse reported in papers [5,[9][10][11][12]. It is also possible to see that corner joints are the main focus of structural damage, and that, for example, the uplift phenomenon and the excessive deformation of corner connections can significantly reduce the dissipative capacity of frames [5,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%