2019
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfusion index cannot be currently recommended as an additional newborn screen for critical congenital heart disease: more data needed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PPI can in fact be influenced, on the first day of life, from conditions such as low body temperature and eventual physiological acrocyanosis [ 16 ]. According to a recent study, PPI measurements combined with pulse oximetry and clinical data are useful for the early identification of obstructive lesions of the left heart; however, the literature data are not yet conclusive and, indeed, other authors state that the perfusion index cannot be currently recommended as an additional newborn screening for CCHD [ 28 , 30 , 31 ]. In our study, the PPI increased the predictive role of POS in detecting pathological conditions and the risk of false positives appeared to be reasonable if compared with the risk of missing diagnosis of life-threatening diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PPI can in fact be influenced, on the first day of life, from conditions such as low body temperature and eventual physiological acrocyanosis [ 16 ]. According to a recent study, PPI measurements combined with pulse oximetry and clinical data are useful for the early identification of obstructive lesions of the left heart; however, the literature data are not yet conclusive and, indeed, other authors state that the perfusion index cannot be currently recommended as an additional newborn screening for CCHD [ 28 , 30 , 31 ]. In our study, the PPI increased the predictive role of POS in detecting pathological conditions and the risk of false positives appeared to be reasonable if compared with the risk of missing diagnosis of life-threatening diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su uso rutinario como parámetro adicional de tamizaje aún se discute, pues aunque podría incrementar la sensibilidad, potencialmente también incrementaría la cantidad de casos falsos positivo incrementar la sensibilidad, incluso la cantidad de casos falsos positivos. 10…”
Section: íNdice De Perfusiónunclassified
“…15,16,18 However, existing data do not yet support inclusion of PI to neonatal CCHD-screening, the high false-positive rate is one concern. 20,21 We hypothesised that the false-positive rate of PI can be reduced by repeating the measurement if below cut-off. Thus, our primary aim was to prospectively determine the false-positive rate of PI in the newborn in a screening setting, using previously proposed cut-offs and three consecutive measurements if below cut-off.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PI as a screening tool has raised some hope in increasing neonatal detection of CoA and other LHOD, 14–19 with reported sensitivities for CoA varying between 33% and 100% depending on the cut‐offs used 15,16,18 . However, existing data do not yet support inclusion of PI to neonatal CCHD‐screening, the high false‐positive rate is one concern 20,21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%