Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services

Abstract

Background Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. Methods We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others’ stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign. Results Of 114 participants aged 27–73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt “fobbed off”); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants’ experiences informed ideas for improving services. Conclusion Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services. Trial registration NCT04435041.

Living with COVID-19: a phenomenological study of hospitalised patients involved in family cluster transmission

“…This finding is in line with earlier study among African Ebola survivors who identified patients caring for each other as a source of resilience for self-preservation, highlighting the prevalence of humanity and strength in crisis across different cultures and communities. 14 Our findings further support Ladds and colleagues’ 12 call to establish online peer support groups during and after COVID-19 to share patients’ experiences and knowledge about the illness.…”

Long COVID and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study

“…41 To date, inconsistent diagnoses of long COVID have made it difficult to ascertain the demographic profile of people with long COVID at a population level, with women disproportionately represented in symptom studies 42 and qualitative research 10 11 along with people of higher educational background. 10 We took steps to achieve a diverse sample in terms of age, gender and ethnicity, but did not collect information on socioeconomic status or geographical characteristics of participants, so are unable to draw firm conclusions about how these factors may influence our findings. Nevertheless, our participants were recruited from a research interest database indicating a level of engagement and access to online research, and our sample might not be representative of the long COVID population as a whole.…”

Characteristics of Long Covid: findings from a social media survey

“…Evidence describing the condition is scarce, but is starting to emerge on the long-term health impairment and organ damage following COVID-19 [7][8][9][10][11] . Patients are struggling to access adequate recognition, support, medical assessment and treatment for their condition, particularly those with no lab evidence of their infection during the first wave of the pandemic when testing was not accessible to those not hospitalised in the initial phase of their COVID-19 disease 12,13 .…”

“…This may result in variation in diagnosis and referral among different clinicians, leading to inequalities in recognition and accessing services 23 . Many of those infected in spring 2020 did not have access to testing and therefore have struggled to receive recognition, diagnosis and support 12,13 . This study was conceived following conversations with people with Long Covid in the community who perceived a lack on data of COVID-19 sequelae in non-hospitalised individuals and felt a need for their experience to be explored and documented.…”