Personal Issue Importance and Motivated-Reasoning Goals for Pro- and Counterattitudinal Exposure: A Moderated Mediation Model of Motivations and Information Selectivity on Elaborative Reasoning

Abstract

This study draws on an experiment combined with Web behavior-tracking data to understand the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, including personal issue importance and motivated-reasoning goals, in influencing people to seek pro-and counterattitudinal information and how this information selectivity in turn affects elaborative reasoning. Findings suggest that proattitudinal exposure mediates the relationship between personal issue importance and generating rationales for one's own viewpoint on the issue, while counterattitudinal exposure mediates the path from personal issue importance to generating rationales for not only oppositional but also one's own viewpoint. This result highlights the significant role of counterattitudinal exposure in enhancing deliberative democracy. However, the moderated mediation analyses further indicate that the indirect paths through counterattitudinal exposure only occur for those who are highly motivated by accuracy goals to search for information. Implications for the functioning of deliberative democracy are discussed.

Spiral of silence on social media and the moderating role of disagreement and publicness in the network: Analyzing expressive and withdrawal behaviors

“…Exposure to counterattitudinal viewpoints is essential to reasoned public opinion and deliberative democracy (Habermas, 1989). Scholars have found that exposure to counterattitudinal viewpoints not only facilitates political tolerance, informed opinion, and a better understanding of a political issue, but it also leads to political ambivalence that makes people uncertain of their own positions and further discourages them from political engagement (Chen, 2017;Mutz, 2002aMutz, , 2002b.…”

Reliability but not bias: Developing a scale to measure preferred channels for risk information during the COVID pandemic

“…There are a number of potential sources of variability in interest and information seeking. A number of studies suggest that those high in need for cognition, or who are higher in motivation, may be inclined to seek out a wider range of media on a given subject, may be more inclined to seek detail, and may acquire a more accurate understanding of risk (see Chen, 2018;Dvir-Gvirsman, 2015;Jung et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2007Wei et al, , 2010Wei et al, , 2015. Similarly, research on dual process models of information processing, such as the heuristic systematic model (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993), would suggest that people will continue to seek information until they reach some level of information sufficiency, whereby they feel that they can make successful decisions (Kahlor, 2007;ter Huurne, Griffin, & Gutteling, 2009;Yang et al, 2011).…”

Second Screening and the Engaged Public: The Role of Second Screening for News and Political Expression in an O-S-R-O-R Model

“…For example, second screening can be used to pay attention to a specific political issue. Thus, the model can be examined to understand issue publics and their issue specificity (Chen, 2018a; Kim, 2009). The model can also be extended to explore more indirect and conditional effects (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013).…”