2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02914-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalised medicine and the decision to withhold chemotherapy in early breast cancer with intermediate risk of recurrence – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose To assess the evidence for decision making, at the health care and the patient levels, regarding the use of gene expression assays to inform chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer patients with intermediate clinical risk of recurrence. Methods Systematic literature searches were performed (January 2002–April 2020) in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and HTA databases. Inclusion criteria: patients (P) were individuals with post-surgical breast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the included articles were narrative reviews [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] (36%) and qualitative researches [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] (28%). As reported in Table 1 , six [ 24 , 25 , 27 , 34 , 40 , 41 ] out of 25 articles (24%) were classified in group 1, since they satisfied at least 75% of the quality criteria, while the majority—11 [ 26 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] out of 25 articles (44%)—were allocated in group 2, meeting between 55% and 74% of the quality criteria. Lastly, 8 [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] out of 25 studies (32%) were inserted in group 3, satisfying less than 55% of the quality criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of the included articles were narrative reviews [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] (36%) and qualitative researches [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] (28%). As reported in Table 1 , six [ 24 , 25 , 27 , 34 , 40 , 41 ] out of 25 articles (24%) were classified in group 1, since they satisfied at least 75% of the quality criteria, while the majority—11 [ 26 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] out of 25 articles (44%)—were allocated in group 2, meeting between 55% and 74% of the quality criteria. Lastly, 8 [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 48 ] out of 25 studies (32%) were inserted in group 3, satisfying less than 55% of the quality criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven [ 24 , 28 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 46 ] out of twenty-five articles (44%) provided information on personalized medicine for the treatment of breast cancer. Results about key dimensions were: Molecular board (compositions and conditions for efficacy): the role, responsibilities and tasks of all members, in particular pathologists and surgeons [ 24 , 28 , 32 , 33 , 35 ] (45%); Evidence-based genetic testing: the benefits and clinical validity of -omics technologies, focusing on BRCA and Oncotype DX [ 24 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 46 ] (82%); Shared-clinical decision-making: a positive impact on the selection of targeted therapy and improvements in chemotherapy, endocrine, and chemo-endocrine therapy decisions [ 24 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 46 ] (82%). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations