2005
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1804_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality at Work: Raising Awareness and Correcting Misconceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
105
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, based on metaanalyses on the prevailing psychological models of individual differences (Costa & McCrae, 1995;Horn & McArdle, 2007;John et al, 2008;McGrew & Wendling, 2010), three variables with greater explanatory power of human behavior and performance are identified. General mental ability (Gottfredson, 2002;Hunter & Hunter, 1984;Ones et al, 2005a;Ree et al, 1994;Salgado et al, 2003;Schmidt & Hunter, 1998 and the dimensions of conscientiousness and emotional stability (Barrick & Mount, 1991Barrick et al, 2001;Hogan & Holland, 2003;Hough & Furnham, 2003;Hurtz & Donovan, 2000;Ones et al, 2005b;Salgado, 1997Salgado, , 1998Salgado, , 2004Salgado & De Fruyt, 2005;Tett, Jackson, & Rothstein, 1991) are the best predictors in the civil and military fields.…”
Section: Hypothetical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, based on metaanalyses on the prevailing psychological models of individual differences (Costa & McCrae, 1995;Horn & McArdle, 2007;John et al, 2008;McGrew & Wendling, 2010), three variables with greater explanatory power of human behavior and performance are identified. General mental ability (Gottfredson, 2002;Hunter & Hunter, 1984;Ones et al, 2005a;Ree et al, 1994;Salgado et al, 2003;Schmidt & Hunter, 1998 and the dimensions of conscientiousness and emotional stability (Barrick & Mount, 1991Barrick et al, 2001;Hogan & Holland, 2003;Hough & Furnham, 2003;Hurtz & Donovan, 2000;Ones et al, 2005b;Salgado, 1997Salgado, , 1998Salgado, , 2004Salgado & De Fruyt, 2005;Tett, Jackson, & Rothstein, 1991) are the best predictors in the civil and military fields.…”
Section: Hypothetical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, the less predictive capacity of personality traits has been verified, although their validity increases when the performance is estimated in terms of other important components of the work (effort, discipline, teamwork, etc.) and theoretically contingent traits are used (Barrick & Mount, 2005;Barrick, Mount, & Judge, 2001;Hogan & Holland, 2003;Hough & Furnham, 2003;Ones, Viswesvaran, & Dilchert, 2005b;Salgado, 1997Salgado, , 1998Salgado & De Fruyt, 2005). The development of a general performance model has also contributed to the understanding of the role of dispositional traits and their use in industrial and organizational fields (Schmitt, Cortina, Ingerick, & Wiechmann, 2003).…”
Section: * Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers who investigate personality structure and measurement are not convinced that results clearly identify the interrelatedness of the work variables under consideration (Ones et al, 2005). Bishay (1996) argued that the Big Five traits may be useful for some research on job performance but may fall short in the measurement of more concrete and narrow personality traits.…”
Section: Personality Work and Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One stream of work concerns individual traits, which refer to individual attributes that consistently distinguish people from one another in terms of their basic tendencies to think, feel, and act in certain ways (Ones, Viswesvaran & Dilchert, 2005). Since traits are reasonably consistent over time (Buss, 1991), they are a particularly useful approach to studying individual behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%