Personality, Family Correlates and Emotion Regulation as Wellbeing Predictors

Bujor, Liliana; Nicoleta, Turliuc Maria

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.346

Cited by 12 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When it comes to the impacts of two types of emotional regulation on life satisfaction, the results are largely consistent with the results of exploring basic relationships (e.g., Yiğit et al, 2014). This conclusion is supported by Hua and associates in a meta-analysis study (Hu, Zhang, & Wang, 2015), but there are also findings on the absence of these effects (Liliana & Nicoleta, 2014).…”

Section: Satisfaction With Life and Emotion Regulation: Operationalizsupporting

confidence: 83%

Genetic and Environmental Factors in Emotion Regulation and Life Satisfaction: A Twin Study

Milovanović

Sadiković

Kodžopeljić

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An expansion of the mental health research at the end of the 20th century largely places well-being in the focus of interest of contemporary psychological science. However, the state of the art results of behavioral-genetic studies provide a complete framework of the factors that influence the indicators of subjective well-being through the specification of etiology of their relationship. The main aim of this study is to evaluate genetic and environmental factors that contribute to connections among life satisfaction measures and emotional regulation. The study included 182 pairs of twins of both sexes (121 monozygotic and 61 dizygotic twin pairs), aged 18-48. The proportion of individual sources of covariance between the examined phenotypes was tested with a multivariate biometric method. Genetic factors explained a slightly higher variance of life satisfaction (53%), while the environmental factors had a significant role in explaining different types of emotional regulation. General genetic factors were potentially important only in the explanation of the cognitive reappraisal of negative emotions. In other cases, the environmental factors were of the greater importance. An insight into the phenotypic correlations suggests these constructs have low to moderate intercorrelations; likewise genetic factors have a potential significance (45%) merely in the case of two types of cognitive reappraisal of emotions.

show abstract

Section: Satisfaction With Life and Emotion Regulation: Operationalizsupporting

confidence: 83%

Genetic and Environmental Factors in Emotion Regulation and Life Satisfaction: A Twin Study

Milovanović

Sadiković

Kodžopeljić

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It involves emotions like anxiety, worry, sadness and tension. Liliana and Nicoleta (2014) showed that emotional stability predicted well-being on all four dimensions: positive affects, negative affects, emotional distress and life satisfaction. Emotion regulation strategies are predictors for (positive and negative) affects only, and not for emotional distress or life satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Emotion regulation is.a cognitive reappraisal strategy to forward aversive emotional reduce the negative and social consequences (Gross, 1998;Matsumoto, Nakagawa, & Sanae, 2008;Volokov, 2008). Liliana and Nicoleta (2014) founded that emotional stability predicts wellbeing on all four dimensions: positive affects, negative affects, emotional distress and life satisfaction. Emotion regulation strategies are predictors for (positive and negative) affects only, and not for emotional distress or life satisfaction.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Personality and Emotion Regulation Strategies

Purnamaningsih

2017

Int. j. psychol. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emotions has many important functions in our life such as in relation of interpersonal communication, and health. In interpersonal communicative function aimed to signal to other information about internal state. Emotions manifests in specific cognitive, behavioural, and physiological reactions, thus closely related to health. There is wide variety of ways for individuals to regulate their emotion. In this regard, there are two kinds of emotion regulation strategy; first Antecedent-focused emotion regulation consisting of situation selection, situation modification, attentional deployment, cognitive change and second, Response-focused emotion regulation consisting of suppression. The purpose of this research is to investigate personality factors relate with emotion regulation strategies. 339 students from Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada were participating in this study and given The Big Five Personality Factors (Ramdhani, 2012, adaptation), and the modified version of the Emotion Regulation Scale was used, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (John & Gross, 2004) which measure personality and emotion regulation respectively. Using multiple regression analysis, the study indicated that personality predicts emotion regulation strategies. ResumenLas emociones tienen muchas funciones importantes en nuestra vida, como en relación de comunicación interpersonal y salud. En la función comunicativa interpersonal se pretende señalar a otros, información sobre estados internos. Las emociones se manifiestan en reacciones cognitivas, conductuales y fisiológicas específicas, por tanto estrechamente relacionadas con la salud. Hay una gran variedad de formas para que los individuos regulen su emoción; en este sentido, hay dos tipos de estrategia de regulación emocional. La primera, regulación de la emoción centrada en los antecedentes: consistente en la selección de la situación, la modificación de la situación, el despliegue atencional y el cambio cognitivo. La segunda, la regulación de la emoción centrada en la respuesta consistenteúnicamente en la supresión. El propósito de esta investigación es investigar los factores de personalidad que se relacionan con las estrategias de regulación emocional. 339 estudiantes de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad de Gadjah Mada participaron en este estudio y se les administró la escala de los cinco gran factores de personalidad (adaptación de Ramdhani, 2012) y la versión modificada de la escala de regulación emocional, el cuestionario de regulación emocional (John & Gross, 2004) que miden la regulación de la personalidad y la emoción respectivamente. El estudio indicó que la personalidad predice las estrategias de regulación de la emoción usando el análisis de regresión múltiple.

show abstract

“…The dimensions of empathy that were evaluated by the new instrument were therefore hypothesized to have a positive relationship with prosociality and a negative relationship with physical and verbal aggression. Moreover, evidence exists about a negative relationship between emotional instability and the dimension of emotional regulation (Singh and Mishra, 2011; Khosla, 2012; Bujor and Turliuc, 2014). Thus, a negative relationship between these constructs was hypothesized.…”

Section: Instrument Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Construct Validity and Reliability of a New Spanish Empathy Questionnaire for Children and Early Adolescents

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empathy is a basic socio-emotional process of human development that involves the ability to perceive, share, and understand the emotional states of others. This process is essential to successful social functioning. However, despite its significance, empathy has been difficult to define and measure, particularly when incorporating both its emotional and cognitive aspects. The purpose of this study was to develop an Empathy Questionnaire for children aged 9–12 years based on a model of social cognitive neuroscience and to analyze its construct validity and reliability. This questionnaire aimed to integrate the following aspects: emotional contagion, self-other awareness, perspective-taking, emotional regulation, and empathic action. Three studies were conducted. Study 1 evaluated the discriminative power of the items and studied the underlying structure of the instrument using exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the model obtained. Finally, the goal of Study 3 was to analyze the convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire and the internal consistency of its dimensions. The final version of the instrument contained 15 items that operationalized the previously listed dimensions. The results of the 3 studies indicated that the questionnaire had good validity and reliability. This study has important implications for research and clinical practice. Given its simplicity and brevity, this new self-report scale may work well as a screening method to evaluate the key psychological issues underlying numerous child behaviors that predict the success or failure of social relationships, individual quality of life, and mental well-being.

show abstract

Personality, Family Correlates and Emotion Regulation as Wellbeing Predictors

Cited by 12 publications

References 16 publications

Genetic and Environmental Factors in Emotion Regulation and Life Satisfaction: A Twin Study

Genetic and Environmental Factors in Emotion Regulation and Life Satisfaction: A Twin Study

Personality and Emotion Regulation Strategies

Construct Validity and Reliability of a New Spanish Empathy Questionnaire for Children and Early Adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About